Ruggedized Computer Enclosure With Monolithic Forced-Air Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ruggedized computers are inefficient in terms of space, power, and performance, unable to handle high thermal output, and are not modular for upgrades, often failing in harsh environments due to inadequate cooling and shock resistance.

Innovation Solution

A universal ruggedized enclosure with a monolithic heat exchanger core and forced air cooling system, utilizing a complex lattice structure and heat pipes to dissipate heat efficiently, while being sealed from the environment and integrating high-performance components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a sealed pelican case is used to ruggedize a desktop computer, then protection from environmental variables is improved, but the form factor becomes large and space efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from environmental variablesVSAvoidform factor
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the enclosure structure with the heat exchanger into a single integrated unit. The enclosure walls themselves form the heat exchanger channels, eliminating the need for separate cooling components and reducing overall volume while maintaining protection and cooling functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The enclosure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides mechanical protection, acts as a heat exchanger for cooling, and maintains structural integrity. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed, thereby reducing overall volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Temperature

If air conditioning unit or Peltier device is used for cooling the air inside the case, then cooling capability is improved, but space requirement and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capabilityVSAvoidspace requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is merged with the enclosure structure itself, with cooling channels formed within the enclosure walls. This eliminates the need for separate air conditioning units or Peltier devices, significantly reducing space requirements while maintaining effective cooling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The enclosure structure itself performs the cooling function through its integrated heat exchanger channels. The system uses the enclosure's own structure to dissipate heat rather than requiring external cooling equipment, reducing space and power requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Temperature

If air conditioning unit is used for cooling, then cooling capability is improved, but power consumption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The passive heat exchanger structure requires no external power source to function. Heat is dissipated naturally through the enclosure walls' internal channels, eliminating the power consumption associated with active cooling systems like air conditioners or Peltier devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the active cooling components (air conditioning units, Peltier devices) from the system and replaces them with a passive heat exchanger structure, eliminating the associated power consumption and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If COTS ruggedized computers are used, then ruggedization is improved, but compute performance and hardware upgradability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveruggedizationVSAvoidhardware upgradability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into modular components: a ruggedized enclosure and separate computer hardware. This allows the computer components to be upgraded independently while maintaining the ruggedized enclosure, combining ruggedization with hardware upgradability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The enclosure is designed to accommodate various computer configurations and upgrades while maintaining its ruggedized protection. The universal enclosure design allows different computer components to be integrated without sacrificing ruggedization capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

5Power

If desktop computer is integrated on ground platform, then compute performance is improved, but shock resistance deteriorates due to limited shock dampening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompute performanceVSAvoidshock resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The shock dampening features are merged into the enclosure structure itself, with vibration isolation elements integrated into the enclosure walls and mounting points. This provides shock protection for high-performance computer components without requiring separate dampening systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The enclosure provides effective cooling and protection in rugged environments, allowing integration of high-performance components without additional infrastructure, maintaining optimal performance and compact form factor.

Implementation Method 1

The enclosure wall structure includes therein an internal geometry of a monolithic heat exchanger core of a monolithic heat exchanger having a plurality of internal channels

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchanger: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

one or more fans configured to drive air via one or more inlets from an enclosure exterior outside of the enclosure wall structure through the internal channels

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced convection: Forced Convection

Data Source

PatentUS20250216914A1Universal ruggedized computer enclosure with forced air cooling
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE AS REPRESENTED BY THE SEC OF THE ARMY
  • US20250216914A1 patent drawing
  • US20250216914A1 patent drawing
  • US20250216914A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, an enclosure device for a printed circuit board (PCB) includes: an enclosure wall structure enclosing an enclosure interior which has a PCB space in which to dispose the PCB, the enclosure wall structure including therein an internal geometry of a monolithic heat exchanger core of a monolithic heat exchanger having a plurality of internal channels, the enclosure wall structure including one or more vents; and one or more fans configured to drive air via one or more inlets from an enclosure exterior outside of the enclosure wall structure through the internal channels and out of the one or more vents. The enclosure wall structure is configured to block air flowing through the internal channels from entering the enclosure interior.