RuIr Core-Shell Catalyst for Low Overpotential OER

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current catalysts for oxygen evolution reactions (OER) and hydrogen evolution reactions (HER) face challenges with high overpotential requirements and low durability, particularly in acidic solutions, where Ru-based catalysts show limited activity and Ir-based catalysts are expensive and less durable.

Innovation Solution

An anisotropic nanostructure represented by RuxM1-x, where 0.6≤x≤0.999, with M being Ir, Rh, Pt, or Au, forming a solid solution and having an anisotropic hexagonal close-packed structure, is produced using a method involving a solution containing Ru and M compounds with a reducing agent at 215 to 230°C, resulting in a catalyst with exposed 0001 planes and high crystallite size ratios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If Ru-based catalysts are used for OER, then high catalytic activity is achieved, but durability drops sharply in acidic solutions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite material consisting of Ru core particles coated with an IrOx shell layer. This composite structure combines the high catalytic activity of Ru with the excellent durability and acid resistance of IrOx, resolving the contradiction between activity and durability in acidic solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different materials to different regions of the catalyst structure: Ru is used in the core where high catalytic activity is needed, while IrOx is applied as a protective shell where acid resistance and durability are required. This local differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between activity and durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If Ir-based catalysts are used for OER, then durability is improved, but cost increases and activity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidcatalytic activity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies IrOx only as a thin shell layer (1-10 nm thickness) on the Ru core, rather than using bulk Ir-based materials. This localized application provides the necessary durability and acid resistance while minimizing the amount of expensive Ir used, thereby reducing cost while maintaining activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a small amount of expensive IrOx as a protective shell that can be replaced or regenerated, while the bulk of the catalyst remains Ru which is cheaper. The thin shell protects the Ru core from dissolution, effectively making the expensive component a durable protective layer rather than the bulk material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Device complexity

If conventional catalysts are used for water electrolysis, then simplicity is maintained, but overpotential is high and efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst structureVSAvoidoverpotential
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a Ru@IrOx core-shell composite structure that combines the advantages of both Ru (high activity, low overpotential) and IrOx (stability, acid resistance). This composite approach achieves low overpotential for water electrolysis while maintaining structural simplicity through a straightforward core-shell architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The catalyst achieves a current density of 10 mA/cm2 with low overpotential in acidic solutions, demonstrating high durability and activity for both OER and HER, surpassing conventional catalysts in stability and cost-effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

Ru and M form a solid solution at the atomic level

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolid solution formation: Solid Solution Strengthening

Implementation Method 2

a solution containing Ru and M compounds with a reducing agent at 215 to 230°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 3

The catalyst achieves a current density of 10 mA/cm2 with low overpotential in acidic solutions, demonstrating high durability and activity for both OER and HER

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS11511262B2Anisotropic nanostructure, production method therefor, and catalyst
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 KYOTO UNIV
  • US11511262B2 patent drawing
  • US11511262B2 patent drawing
  • US11511262B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention provides an anisotropic nanostructure represented by the formula:RuxM1-x,wherein 0.6≤x≤0.999, and M represents at least one member selected from the group consisting of Ir, Rh, Pt, Pd, and Au, and wherein Ru and M form a solid solution at the atomic level, and the anisotropic nanostructure has an anisotropic hexagonal close-packed structure (hcp).