Rule Analysis Module Optimizing Security Policy Placement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current network security management systems require manual, labor-intensive processes for administrators to configure policies and respond to cyberthreats, making them inefficient and burdensome in the face of increasing cyber threats.

Innovation Solution

An integrated security management system that includes a threat control module for visualizing threats, a rule analysis module for optimizing rule placement, and a policy deployment engine for automating the configuration and deployment of security policies across distributed security devices, enabling administrators to interactively manage and optimize security rules for enhanced threat detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If administrators manually configure security policies to respond to cyber threats, then security coverage can be customized, but the process becomes labor-intensive and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity policy customizationVSAvoidthreat response efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated rule generation and optimization. The rule analysis module automatically analyzes security rules, determines optimal placements, and generates placement recommendations without requiring manual administrator intervention for each rule configuration, thus maintaining customization while improving efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-analyzing security rules and determining optimal placements before deployment. The rule analysis module evaluates rules in advance, identifies placement anomalies, and provides optimization recommendations that administrators can review and approve, ensuring both customization and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If security rules are manually configured and placed in lists, then rule placement can be customized, but administrators face increasing burden with sophisticated cyber threats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverule configuration simplicityVSAvoidsecurity management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rule analysis module serves as an intermediary between administrators and security rule management. It automatically performs complex analysis tasks such as rule placement optimization and anomaly detection, presenting simplified recommendations to administrators while handling the complexity of rule interactions and placements in the background

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical rule placement processes with automated analysis mechanisms. The rule analysis module uses automated algorithms to determine optimal rule placements based on security parameters and threat patterns, substituting manual administrative work with intelligent automated systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Area of stationary object

If security policies are deployed across distributed security devices, then network coverage is improved, but configuration and management becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork security coverageVSAvoiddistributed system management
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rule analysis module provides universal functionality for managing security rules across distributed security devices. It implements a standardized rule analysis and optimization framework that can be applied uniformly across multiple devices, simplifying the management of distributed security systems through consistent automated processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10382451B2Integrated security system having rule optimization
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US10382451B2 patent drawing
  • US10382451B2 patent drawing
  • US10382451B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for optimizing the placement of automatically generated rules within security policies. An administrator may, for example, interact with the graphical representation of rules rendered by the threat control module and, responsive to the interaction, the system may determine an optimal placement for the created rule in the list of rules for the identified security device based on either the existence of anomalies or threat IP data and/or advanced security parameters. In this way, the system allows administrators to configure rules with the most optimal sequence to detect threats.