Rule-Based 3D Road Intersection Model Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current process of designing 3D road intersections is manual and inefficient, requiring repeated checks and modifications to ensure compliance with design standards, and often results in the creation of 2D models rather than true 3D representations.

Innovation Solution

A rule-based system that automatically designs and updates 3D road intersections based on design conditions and vehicle types, using predefined rules to ensure compliance with standards such as AASHTO guidelines, allowing for dynamic updates and the creation of reusable intersection components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual process is used to create intersections, then flexibility in design modification is maintained, but productivity and efficiency deteriorate due to repeated checks and modifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintersection design efficiencyVSAvoidmanual design flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically generating intersection designs that comply with AASHTO standards without requiring manual intervention. The automated rule-based system performs design, validation, and modification tasks independently, eliminating the need for repeated manual checks while maintaining design flexibility through programmable rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by transitioning from manual design parameters to automated rule-based parameters. Design standards, vehicle dimensions, and geometric constraints are encoded as programmable parameters that automatically guide intersection creation, improving productivity while maintaining flexibility through parameter adjustability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If manual design process is used, then design modifications can be made iteratively, but time consumption increases due to repeated checks and modifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign iteration timeVSAvoiddesign standard compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously validating intersection designs against AASHTO standards during the automated design process. The rule-based system provides immediate feedback on compliance, automatically adjusting designs to meet requirements, which reduces iteration time while ensuring reliability through systematic validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-encoding all AASHTO design standards and constraints into the rule-based system before design creation. This preliminary configuration ensures that compliance checks are built-in from the start, eliminating the need for repeated validation iterations and reducing time loss while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If 2D models are created manually, then simplicity in creation is maintained, but manufacturing precision deteriorates as true 3D representations are not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improve3D model accuracyVSAvoidmodeling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dimensionality change by transitioning from 2D intersection representations to true 3D models. The automated rule-based system generates three-dimensional geometric data including vertical profiles, cross-sections, and spatial relationships, achieving manufacturing precision through 3D modeling while managing complexity through algorithmic generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If automated rule-based system is implemented, then productivity and precision are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintersection design throughputVSAvoidsystem automation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing the complex automated design process into distinct modular rule sets. Each rule handles specific aspects of intersection design (geometric constraints, vehicle clearance, drainage requirements, etc.), allowing the system to achieve high productivity through organized complexity while maintaining manageability through modular structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10255383B2Rule based three-dimensional (3D) intersection model
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 AUTODESK INC
  • US10255383B2 patent drawing
  • US10255383B2 patent drawing
  • US10255383B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus, system, and computer program product provide the ability to design a road intersection in a three-dimensional (3D) modeling and visualization system. Two roads are defined in the system with the second road intersecting the first road. A set of design rules (that define characteristics of use that contribute to a shape of the road intersection) is acquired. Based on the set of rules, a 3D model of the road intersection is directly created. A property of one of the roads is modified. Without additional user input, the 3D model of the road intersection is automatically and dynamically updated based on the modified property and while maintaining conformance with the set of design rules.