Information Processing Apparatus Rule Update Error Detection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing information processing systems fail to detect operation errors when processing rules are changed, leading to incorrect execution of operations by user terminals due to outdated rule versions.
Innovation Solution
An information processing apparatus with a processing rule management section, executed operation information acquisition section, and determination section that compares executed operations with updated processing rules to identify and notify errors, ensuring operations are performed according to the latest rule versions.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If processing rules are changed to improve adaptability, then the system can handle new requirements, but operation errors occur when terminals execute outdated rules
Solution Approach 1:
The system establishes a feedback mechanism where the information processing apparatus monitors executed operation information from terminals and compares it against updated processing rules. When discrepancies are detected (indicating terminals are executing outdated rules), the system generates error notifications to alert users. This closed-loop feedback ensures that rule updates are properly propagated and executed across the system.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary validation by comparing executed operations against the latest processing rules before allowing operations to complete. The determination section pre-checks whether executed operations conform to current rules, preventing incorrect operations from being finalized and ensuring compliance with updated requirements.
2Reliability
If operation error detection is implemented to improve reliability, then execution accuracy improves, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The information processing apparatus performs multiple functions using the same core components: it manages processing rules, acquires executed operation information from terminals, determines compliance by comparing operations against rules, and notifies errors. This multi-functional approach avoids adding separate dedicated systems for each task, thereby limiting complexity growth while achieving reliable error detection.
3Measurement precision
If continuous setting operations are managed with identification numbers to improve tracking, then operation verification becomes possible, but processing complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system attaches identification numbers (parameters) to processing rules and their constituent operations. This parameterization enables precise tracking and comparison of executed operations against defined rules. The determination section uses these identification numbers to match executed operations with corresponding rule operations, enabling accurate verification without requiring complex structural changes to the rule management system.
Data Source
AI summary
Provided is an information processing apparatus including a processing rule management section that manages plural continuous setting operations, which are set as processing rules for completing processing, by applying identification numbers to the processing rules at least some of which are changed, an executed operation information acquisition section that acquires executed operation information relating to operations executed for completing the processing in an order in which the executed operations are performed, and a determination section that determines if the executed operation information based on comparison between the acquired executed operation information and each of the setting operations in the plural processing rules managed by the processing rule management section is true or false.