Autonomous Vehicle Rulebook Scenario Generation for Control Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Self-driving vehicles face challenges in navigating complex driving scenarios due to varying traffic laws, cultural expectations, and safety considerations, making it difficult to execute decisions effectively.

Innovation Solution

A signal processing system generates simulated scenarios using a hierarchical plurality of rules to test and train control systems, identifying trajectories that violate high-priority rules, thereby improving automated vehicle testing and driving behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional testing methods are used for control systems, then the testing process is simple, but the testing coverage and quality are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting qualityVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of driving scenarios through simulated environments that replicate real-world conditions. These digital twins allow comprehensive testing of control systems without physical vehicle deployment, enabling thorough validation of edge cases and rare events while reducing testing costs and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary generation and validation of test scenarios before actual control system testing. Scenarios are pre-processed to ensure they meet quality criteria, and the testing framework is established in advance, allowing systematic exploration of the decision space before execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive scenario generation is performed to cover all driving cases, then testing coverage improves, but computational resources and time are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario coverageVSAvoidscenario generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically varies scenario parameters such as environmental conditions, traffic participant behaviors, and road configurations to generate diverse test cases. By changing key parameters within defined ranges, the system achieves comprehensive coverage of driving scenarios while avoiding redundant generation of identical cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The testing framework employs a hierarchical structure where general driving scenarios contain specific edge cases, which in turn contain particular test conditions. This nested organization allows the system to manage complexity by breaking down comprehensive scenario generation into manageable layers, from broad scenario categories to specific test instances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the control system is tested with diverse scenarios, then the system's adaptability improves, but the complexity of managing test cases increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system adaptabilityVSAvoidtest management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the comprehensive test scenario space into segmented categories based on driving contexts, environmental conditions, and traffic situations. Each segment can be independently generated, tested, and managed, allowing systematic organization of diverse test cases while maintaining overall test coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where test results inform subsequent scenario generation and refinement. Performance data from controlled tests feeds back into the scenario generation process, allowing automatic adjustment of test parameters and identification of gaps in scenario coverage, thereby reducing manual test management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12576865B2Control system testing utilizing rulebook scenario generation
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 MOTIONAL AD LLC
  • US12576865B2 patent drawing
  • US12576865B2 patent drawing
  • US12576865B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are methods for testing of a control system of a vehicle using generated rulebook based scenarios, which can include determining a simulated environment, receiving a hierarchical plurality of autonomous vehicle rules, determining a trajectory of a simulated vehicle within the simulated environment, generating a plurality of simulated scenarios for the simulated vehicle, identifying at least one violation of at least one autonomous vehicle rule by the simulated vehicle in a set of the simulated scenarios, determining a scenario score for each simulated scenario based on the violations, and identifying at least one simulated scenario for a trained neural network of a vehicle based on the scenario scores.