Rules-Based Answer Script Mapping to Eligible Markers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital marking systems lack the ability to apply specific rules for assigning answer scripts to markers and do not consider factors that impact marking quality and schedule, leading to inefficiencies and inaccuracies in the evaluation process.

Innovation Solution

A processor-implemented method and system for rules-based mapping of answer scripts to markers, which preprocesses scripts to generate metadata, analyzes pre-defined rules, calculates productivity metrics for markers, and uses logistic regression to assign scripts to the most eligible markers based on expertise and availability, ensuring high marking standards and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If round robin mechanism is used for assigning answer scripts to markers, then the assignment process is simple and fast, but it does not accommodate specific requirements and rules for answer script assignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment speedVSAvoidrule-based assignment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static round-robin assignment mechanism to a dynamic rule-based assignment system that can adapt to different requirements. The assignment logic changes from fixed sequential distribution to flexible rule-driven distribution, allowing the system to accommodate various marking requirements while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces multiple parameters for marker selection including expertise matching, availability status, marking quality metrics, and workload distribution. These parameters enable the system to evaluate and select markers based on comprehensive criteria rather than simple sequential assignment, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual routing data entry is required, then the system can accommodate custom requirements, but it increases administrative burden and processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustom requirement accommodationVSAvoidadministrative processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated rule analysis and marker selection. Instead of requiring administrators to manually configure routing data, the system automatically analyzes answer script attributes, applies predefined rules, and selects appropriate markers, eliminating administrative burden while maintaining custom requirement accommodation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring rule sets and marker profiles before the actual assignment process. This preparation work is done once and reused across multiple assignments, reducing the time required for each individual assignment while maintaining the ability to handle custom requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If traditional marking systems are used, then the process is straightforward, but they do not consider factors impacting marking quality and schedule

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidmarking quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring marker performance metrics including marking quality, speed, and accuracy. This feedback is used to dynamically adjust marker assignments and provide real-time insights, ensuring consistent marking quality while maintaining system manageability through automated control loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual administrative processes with automated computational mechanisms. Instead of human administrators manually managing assignments and quality control, the system uses algorithms to analyze attributes, apply rules, and optimize assignments, improving reliability while keeping the interface simple for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If answer scripts are not pre-processed and metadata is not generated, then the processing pipeline is shorter and faster, but specific rules cannot be applied and mapping accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidmapping accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of answer scripts including attribute extraction, metadata generation, and rule analysis before the actual mapping process. This preparation ensures that all necessary information is available for accurate rule-based assignment, improving mapping precision without significantly impacting overall processing time through efficient pipeline design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230385659A1Systems and methods for rules-based mapping of answer scripts to markers
Publication Date: 2023.11.30 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US20230385659A1 patent drawing
  • US20230385659A1 patent drawing
  • US20230385659A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Existing digital marking systems employ round robin mechanism for assigning candidate responses to faculty members for correction which may require manually feeding routing data. These mechanisms do not accommodate specific requirements when rules are to be applied for answer scripts assignment to markers and do not take into consideration marking quality and schedule. Present disclosure provides systems and methods that achieve high marking standards by assigning answer script to a most eligible marker wherein parts of answer script are assigned to most eligible domain marker in case of segmented marking. Marker and answer script attributes are captured that form part of assignment rules thus enabling creation of conditions. Marker profiles are generated based on expertise and availability. Marker's submissions and past performance are analysed, and best suited markers are evaluated and ranked for correcting answer script, thereby ensuring highest possible level of marking quality and accuracy within stipulated time frame.