Rumor Cascade Management via Message Veracity Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Online social networks and electronic communication platforms face challenges in controlling the spread of non-factual and harmful information, leading to the persistence of false rumors and advertising cascades.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that analyzes messages and corresponding message streams to determine their veracity, allowing actions such as fact-checking, removal, conditional sharing, or disabling of messages based on confidence values, thereby reducing or preventing the spread of non-factual information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If messages are freely shared across online social networks, then information sharing speed and connectivity are improved, but non-factual and harmful information spreads rapidly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation sharing speedVSAvoidspread of non-factual information
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of messages before they are shared, using machine learning models to predict whether a message is likely to be non-factual or harmful. This preliminary screening action prevents harmful information from entering the sharing cascade while maintaining the speed of legitimate information flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary filtering system is introduced between the message source and the sharing network. This intermediary component analyzes messages using multiple machine learning models and only allows factually accurate messages to proceed through the sharing mechanism, thus preventing harmful information spread without blocking legitimate communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If fact-checking and verification processes are implemented, then information accuracy is improved, but system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of verification from manual human fact-checking to automated machine learning-based verification. By transforming the verification process into a computational parameter-driven system, it maintains high reliability while reducing operational complexity and processing time through efficient algorithmic analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-service verification where machine learning models automatically analyze and verify message content without requiring external human intervention. The models self-calibrate using training data and continuously improve their verification accuracy, reducing system complexity while maintaining high information accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If all messages are analyzed and queued for review, then information quality is improved, but data storage requirements and processing load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation qualityVSAvoiddata storage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and removes non-factual and harmful messages from the data stream before they enter the queuing and storage system. By taking out problematic content at the source through preliminary machine learning analysis, the system reduces the quantity of data that requires storage and processing while maintaining high information quality among retained messages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of analyzing all messages with full verification depth, the system applies partial action by using lightweight machine learning models for initial screening. Only messages that pass this preliminary filter undergo more thorough analysis, reducing storage and processing requirements while maintaining acceptable information quality through selective deep verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10110531B2Electronic rumor cascade management in computer network communications
Publication Date: 2018.10.23 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10110531B2 patent drawing
  • US10110531B2 patent drawing
  • US10110531B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Controlling cascade of information transmitted and received via one or more online data sharing platforms and electronic communication network. A message to be shared is detected. The message and the corresponding message stream may be analyzed. An action may be taken upon the message responsive to one or more criteria being met based on analyzing the message and the corresponding message stream. The action may include at least forcing a fact check of the message that determines veracity of the message. The action may also include one or more of removing the message, disabling the message, allowing conditional sharing of the message, or allowing the message to be shared. The one or more criteria may include at least determining a confidence value below a threshold value that indicates the message is non-factual.