Run-Flat Tire Inner Layer Segmentation for Airtightness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Prior art runflat tires face issues with the inner liner detaching during runflat operation, leading to loss of airtightness, which increases manufacturing costs and weight.

Innovation Solution

The inner layer does not cover the upper ends of the reinforcement profiles axially on the inside, eliminating free edges that could detach, and is strategically positioned between the upper ends with additional inner layer strips in the bead area to ensure airtightness and secure the edges, using a non-butyl rubber mixture where necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the inner layer is omitted within the cross-sectional height of the reinforcement profile, then material savings reduce costs and weight, but the inner layer edges may detach during run-flat operation causing air leakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetire weightVSAvoidairtightness
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The inner layer is segmented into two separate parts: one in the bead area and another between the upper ends of the reinforcement profiles, omitting it within the cross-sectional height of the reinforcement profile. This segmentation reduces material usage and weight while maintaining airtightness through strategic placement of inner layer segments that prevent detachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The inner layer is selectively positioned in specific local areas where it provides maximum benefit: in the bead area to ensure airtightness and between the upper ends of reinforcement profiles to prevent edge detachment. The inner layer is omitted in the cross-sectional height of the reinforcement profile where it would not contribute to airtightness but would create detachment risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If the inner layer is omitted within the cross-sectional height of the reinforcement profile, then manufacturing costs are reduced, but the inner layer edges are exposed and vulnerable to detachment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidairtightness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The inner layer is divided into discrete segments placed at critical locations rather than forming a continuous layer. This segmentation reduces material costs and manufacturing complexity while ensuring airtightness through strategic placement in the bead area and between reinforcement profile upper ends.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The inner layer is extracted from the cross-sectional height of the reinforcement profile where it would create detachment problems, while being retained in the bead area and between upper ends where it provides essential airtightness and prevents edge exposure. This selective extraction reduces material usage and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3297848B1Pneumatic vehicle tire with run-flat properties
Publication Date: 2019.10.30 CONTINENTAL REIFEN DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
  • EP3297848B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

A pneumatic vehicle tire with run-flat properties, having a tread (1), having a multi-ply belt assembly (2), having an inner ply (4) which is of air-tight form, having a carcass (3) which, in the bead region (5), is led from axially inside axially outward as a carcass turn-up (3a) around tension-resistant cores (6), and having side walls (8) within which there is arranged at least one reinforcement profile (9) which is of sickle-shaped cross section and which is of closed ring-shaped form around the circumference of the side wall, wherein the inner ply (4) does not run continuously through the tire cross section from bead region (5) to bead region (5), it rather being the case that, within the cross-sectional height (10) of the reinforcement profile (9), the inner ply is omitted; the inner ply (4a) is, in a region situated opposite the tread (1), arranged between the two upper ends (11) of the reinforcement profiles (9), and the inner ply (4a) does not cover said two ends (11) of the reinforcement profiles (9) axially at the inside.