Run Selector Valve Biasing for Sealing Under Obstruction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing commodity run selector devices face issues with incomplete rotation and fluid pressure cross-talk due to obstructions, which can prevent full movement of valve bodies and compromise the sealing of run selector devices, especially when a clog occurs between the valve body and the housing.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a biasing system with a first biasing element on the housing and a second biasing element on the valve body, which are movable relative to each other to urge the valve body into desired positions, and the incorporation of a predetermined amount of backlash in the control linkage system to allow independent movement of each run selector device, preventing obstruction-related issues from affecting others.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a common linkage mechanism is used to control multiple run selector devices in parallel, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates because an obstruction in one device can prevent full movement of all valve bodies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The common linkage mechanism is segmented into individual linkage members, each connected to a separate run selector device. This allows each valve body to move independently without being constrained by obstructions in other devices, while still enabling coordinated control through the segmented linkage system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each run selector device is given its own biasing element (spring) that provides localized sealing force to its valve body. This ensures that each device maintains its own sealing quality independently, so an obstruction in one device does not compromise the sealing of other devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If valve bodies are tightly sealed against housing walls, then fluid pressure cross-talk is prevented, but ease of manufacture deteriorates due to tighter tolerances required

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A biasing element (spring) is introduced as an intermediary between the valve body and the housing. This spring provides the necessary sealing force to ensure reliable sealing and prevent fluid pressure cross-talk, while allowing for larger manufacturing tolerances compared to a rigid tight-fit design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If backlash is added to the control linkage to allow independent movement, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control linkage incorporates controlled play or backlash between linkage members, transforming a rigid static connection into a dynamic system that can accommodate independent movement of each valve body. This dynamic characteristic allows each device to move freely without being constrained by the position of other devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures that valve bodies can move fully into their designated positions, maintaining proper sealing and preventing fluid pressure cross-talk, even if one device is obstructed, by using built-in backlash and biasing mechanisms to compensate for obstructions and maintain efficient operation.

Implementation Method 1

The first and second biasing elements are mutually biased against each other to urge each other apart and towards a one or the other of the opposite first and second biasing system positions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3944747B1Biasing system
Publication Date: 2024.12.11 DEERE & CO
  • EP3944747B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3944747B1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP3944747B1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

A biasing system (600, 700, 800, 900, 1000) for use with an associated run selector device is disclosed. The biasing system (600, 700, 800, 900, 1000) having a valve member movable within a housing between opposite first and second run selection positions selecting respective first and second commodity distribution runs of the associated run selector device, the biasing system (600, 700) comprising: a first biasing element on the housing of the associated run selector device; and a second biasing element on the valve member of the associated run selector device, wherein the first and second biasing elements are movable relative to each other between opposite first and second biasing system positions together with the associated valve member being moved relative to the housing between the opposite first and second run selection positions, wherein the first and second biasing elements are mutually biased against each other to urge each other apart and towards a one or the other of the opposite first and second biasing system positions. Furthermore, a run selection device with such a biasing system is disclosed.