Runtime Function Metadata Verification for Nano Functions
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Traditional software development is time-consuming, error-prone, and costly, requiring skilled teams and extensive resources, making it difficult for smaller entities or solo developers to create reliable, enterprise-scale web applications that meet quality and security standards.
Innovation Solution
A platform for runtime management of application components that allows users to configure and deploy applications by determining functions to be executed as nano functions, verifying compliance with license terms and versioning, and employing containerized execution to ensure deterministic behavior and efficient resource usage.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If traditional software development methods are used, then applications can be developed with full functionality, but the development process becomes time-consuming, error-prone, and expensive requiring large teams
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments applications into reusable functions that can be independently developed, verified, and combined. Functions are broken down into smaller executable units with defined interfaces, allowing parallel development and reducing overall development time while maintaining quality through modular verification processes
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements preliminary verification of function compliance with license terms and version requirements before execution. Metadata is prepared in advance containing verification rules, and the system performs automated checks before functions are executed, ensuring quality and security requirements are met prior to deployment
2Reliability
If skilled development teams are assembled to ensure quality and security, then reliable applications can be created, but the cost and complexity of the project increases significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements self-service verification where the system automatically checks function compliance with license terms, version requirements, and security policies without requiring manual review by skilled personnel. The automated verification process using metadata reduces dependency on expert teams while maintaining high reliability standards
Solution Approach 2:
The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where verification results from automated checks are used to guide function execution and deployment decisions. The system provides feedback on compliance status and adjusts execution based on verification outcomes, ensuring quality requirements are met through automated control loops rather than manual inspection
3Productivity
If functions are executed without verification, then development and deployment is faster, but compliance with license terms and version control cannot be ensured
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs preliminary verification of license terms and version compliance before function execution. Metadata containing verification rules is prepared in advance, and automated checks are conducted prior to deployment, ensuring compliance requirements are met before functions are executed, thus maintaining both speed and adaptability
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces metadata as an intermediary layer between function execution and compliance verification. The metadata contains verification rules and requirements, acting as a mediator that enables automated checking of license terms and version control without slowing down the execution process, thus maintaining both productivity and adaptability
4Quantity of substance
If resource requirements are reduced for smaller teams, then development becomes more accessible, but the ability to create enterprise-scale applications is compromised
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges multiple functions into composite applications through a standardized framework. Reusable functions are combined to build enterprise-scale applications, allowing smaller teams to leverage pre-developed functionality rather than building everything from scratch, thus reducing resource requirements while maintaining the capability to create complex applications
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates universal functions with standardized interfaces that can be used across multiple applications. A single function can serve multiple purposes and be reused in different contexts, increasing the versatility and capability of smaller teams to create enterprise-scale applications without proportionally increasing resource requirements
Data Source
AI summary
Techniques are described for runtime checking of function metadata prior to execution of a function in an environment. An application may include any appropriate number of components at one or more levels in a hierarchical arrangement, and each component may be packaged with metadata that describes the component. A function, or any component, may be packaged with metadata that includes term(s) governing the usage of the function. The term(s) may be checked, at runtime, during execution of the application to determine whether the function is to be executed. A function may also be hashed at runtime for verification of function version. Function(s) may be individually and independently executed as containerized nano functions within the environment.


