Runtime Interpreter for Automation Control Program Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automation devices face challenges in reconciling runtime efficiency and change management, particularly in continuous process engineering, where conventional systems either support change management poorly due to low runtime efficiency or sacrifice it for optimal efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid runtime system is implemented, using a runtime interpreter to evaluate and convert sequence descriptions into machine code, enabling 'hot swapping' of control programs without interrupting technical processes, by storing affected program elements in memory and using an updated sequence description for quick switching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If interpretive code is executed to support change management during operation, then change management capability is improved, but runtime efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechange management capabilityVSAvoidruntime efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control program is segmented into individual automation functions that can be independently compiled into machine code. The sequence description is separated as a control structure that orchestrates these functions. This segmentation allows the runtime system to execute compiled functions efficiently while the sequence description enables flexible control flow and change management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Automation functions are pre-compiled into machine code before runtime execution. This preliminary compilation action ensures optimal runtime efficiency for the function execution while the sequence description, which is interpreted, provides the flexible control structure for change management during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If machine code is executed to achieve optimal runtime efficiency, then runtime efficiency is improved, but change management capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveruntime efficiencyVSAvoidchange management capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The sequence description acts as an intermediary between the control program logic and the executed automation functions. It provides a flexible, interpretable control structure that enables change management during operation, while the individual automation functions are compiled into efficient machine code for optimal runtime execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the control program have different execution characteristics: automation functions are compiled into machine code for efficient local execution, while the sequence description remains as an interpretable control structure that provides global flexibility and enables change management. Each part optimizes for its specific purpose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If control programs are changed during operation in continuous process engineering, then adaptability is improved, but process interruption risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational adaptabilityVSAvoidprocess continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control program is divided into separate automation functions and a sequence description. When changes are needed during operation, only the sequence description needs to be updated and re-interpreted, while the compiled automation functions remain unchanged. This segmentation isolates the change impact and prevents process interruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The runtime system performs preliminary validation and preparation of the updated sequence description before activating it. Affected automation functions are identified and prepared in advance, ensuring that the switchover can occur without interrupting the continuous process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP1947536B1Configuration update method for a working automation device
Publication Date: 2009.12.30 SIEMENS AG
  • EP1947536B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The method involves occurring of evaluation and conversion of the operational sequence instructions (36) in a processable form by a run time interpreter (40) for a processing unit (38) of the automation unit (10). An accessible storage (14) is provided in connection with a variation of the control program (16) related to the varied program elements (32) in addition to the existing program elements in an automation unit. Independent claims are also included for the following: (1) a computer program with a computer executing program code instructions for executing the method (2) a computer program product, particularly storage medium.