Runtime Security Algorithm Selection for Post-Quantum Load Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge lies in selecting suitable quantum cryptography algorithms that balance encryption and decryption operations while addressing the vulnerability of traditional encryption methods to quantum computers, as existing solutions often lead to exponential increases in computational load due to key length doubling.

Innovation Solution

A security algorithm selection system and method utilizing an environment scanning unit, algorithm evaluation unit, risk evaluation unit, and algorithm regrouping unit to efficiently match runtime environments with suitable security algorithms, incorporating joint continuous density functions and learning algorithms to optimize algorithm selection and reduce computational overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If quantum cryptography algorithms are used to enhance security against quantum computers, then security strength is improved, but computational load increases exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity strengthVSAvoidcomputational load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts algorithm parameters such as key length and computational complexity based on the security requirements and computational resources of the target environment. By changing parameters rather than always using maximum-security algorithms, the system achieves adequate security with reduced computational load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic algorithm selection mechanism that adapts to different runtime environments. The system evaluates hardware capabilities, security requirements, and performance constraints in real-time to select and configure the most appropriate quantum cryptography algorithm, rather than using a static one-size-fits-all approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If key length is doubled to reduce decryption risk, then security is improved, but encryption and decryption operations increase exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecryption resistanceVSAvoidencryption operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system selectively applies key length adjustments based on the specific algorithm and security requirements. Rather than universally doubling key lengths, the system optimizes key parameters for each algorithm type, achieving adequate decryption resistance while minimizing the impact on encryption and decryption operation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple security algorithms are available to meet diverse requirements, then adaptability is improved, but algorithm selection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm compatibilityVSAvoidselection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated algorithm selection system that autonomously evaluates runtime environment characteristics, security requirements, and algorithm performance to select the most appropriate algorithm. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for manual selection and reduces selection complexity while maintaining high adaptability to different requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that evaluate the performance and suitability of selected algorithms in the actual runtime environment. This feedback is used to refine future algorithm selections, creating a closed-loop system that improves adaptability while managing complexity through data-driven decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250390582A1Security algorithm selection system and selection method thereof
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 CHELPIS QUANTUM CORP
  • US20250390582A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390582A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390582A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A security algorithm selection system and a selection method thereof, which has an environment scanning unit for scanning an electronic device and obtaining a runtime environment information, an algorithm evaluation unit equipped with at least one joint continuous density function, and a risk evaluation unit with at least one judgment module, the risk evaluation unit obtains a first security algorithm information from the algorithm evaluation unit, obtains an implementation security algorithm from a security algorithm instance database, obtains a corresponding risk datum from an instance risk database, then generates at least one second security algorithm information through calculation by the judgment module, and then transmits the second security algorithm information to the electronic device.