Rustic Bevel Panel Indentation Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing panel designs for cladding substrates either require complex processing for a realistic appearance or involve flat sloping surfaces that are difficult to manufacture and do not provide a rustic appearance.

Innovation Solution

The panel features a chamfer formed exclusively by multiple indentations, with different groups of indentations inclined at distinct angles, created using material-removing tools operating at varying speeds and angles, ensuring the indentations overlap extensively to eliminate flat sloping surfaces and enhance the rustic appearance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If a chamfer is formed by separate depressions in a flat inclined surface, then the rustic appearance is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverustic appearanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The chamfer is segmented into multiple separate depressions or indentations rather than being a continuous flat inclined surface. These depressions are arranged in a regular pattern and extend along the side surface, creating a rustic appearance while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through systematic repetition of the same geometric feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flat inclined surface is modified locally by adding separate depressions at specific positions. The depressions are distributed along the chamfer in a regular arrangement, creating localized variations in surface topology that enhance the rustic appearance without fundamentally changing the overall chamfer geometry or manufacturing approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If a planar inclined surface is produced extending over the entire length of the side surface, then the manufacturing process is simplified, but the rustic appearance is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidrustic appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of creating a continuous planar inclined surface, the chamfer is segmented into multiple discrete depressions or indentations. This segmentation maintains the ease of manufacturing through systematic repetition while introducing surface variations that create the desired rustic appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The depressions or indentations introduce curved or non-planar surface features into the chamfer geometry. These curved elements contrast with the straight, planar surfaces, creating visual interest and a rustic appearance while being manufacturable through standard forming processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Shape

If the visible surface is structured three-dimensionally up to its side edges, then the rustic appearance is enhanced, but the manufacturing complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverustic appearanceVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The three-dimensional structuring is segmented and localized to specific regions (separate depressions along the side surface) rather than applying complex processing to the entire visible surface. This selective segmentation achieves rustic appearance enhancement while avoiding the manufacturing complexity of fully three-dimensionally structuring the visible surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of uniformly structuring the entire visible surface three-dimensionally, the rustic effect is achieved through localized depressions or indentations along the side surface. This local quality approach concentrates the rustic appearance features where they are most visible while minimizing the overall processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3063347B1Panel with rustic bevel and method for production of same
Publication Date: 2017.08.09 KAINDL FLOORING GMBH
  • EP3063347B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3063347B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3063347B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a panel (10) for cladding a subsurface, wherein in order to form a bevel (30) on the transition of the visible surface (12) to at least one (16) of the lateral surfaces a plurality of recesses (34, 38) are formed, said recesses emanating from the visible surface (12), extending in an inclined manner (α, ß) relative to the visible surface and each ending in a lateral surface (16). According to the invention, the bevel (30) is formed exclusively from the plurality of recesses (34, 38), wherein the recesses comprise at least one first group of recesses (34) and a second group of recesses (38), wherein the recesses (34) of the first group all extend in an inclined manner relative to the visible surface (12) according to a first angle of inclination (α) and wherein the recesses (38) of the second group all extend in an inclined manner relative to the visible surface (12) according to a second angle of inclination (ß), and wherein the first angle of inclination (α) and the second angle of inclination (ß) are different from one another. The invention also relates to a method for producing such a panel (10).