Ruthenium Copper CMP Slurry Selectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional chemical mechanical polishing compositions for semiconductor substrates with ruthenium and copper layers face challenges such as non-uniform removal rates and the formation of toxic ruthenium tetraoxide, along with galvanic attack issues due to differing reduction potentials, leading to undesirable non-uniformities and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

A chemical mechanical polishing slurry composition comprising water, 0.1 to 25 wt% abrasive, 0.05 to 1 wt% sodium hypochlorite or potassium hypochlorite, 0.001 to 1 wt% copolymer of acrylic acid and methacrylic acid, 0.005 to 1 wt% copper corrosion inhibitor, and 0.0005 to 0.01 wt% poly(methylvinyl ether), with a pH of 8 to 12, is used in conjunction with a polishing pad and machine to achieve selective removal of ruthenium and copper while avoiding toxic byproducts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional polishing compositions with strong oxidizing agents are used for ruthenium polishing, then ruthenium removal rate is improved, but toxic ruthenium tetraoxide gas is formed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveruthenium removal rateVSAvoidtoxic ruthenium tetraoxide formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the polishing composition by using mild oxidizing agents (hypochlorite with E° = 0.89 V) instead of strong oxidizing agents, and controlling pH to be greater than 7, thereby eliminating toxic ruthenium tetraoxide formation while maintaining effective ruthenium removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful strong oxidizing environment into a beneficial mild oxidizing environment that selectively removes ruthenium without forming toxic gases, while the mild conditions simultaneously protect copper from unwanted oxidation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Productivity

If conventional polishing compositions with strong oxidizing agents are used, then ruthenium polishing is effective, but copper oxidizes quickly leading to non-uniform removal rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveruthenium polishing effectivenessVSAvoidremoval rate uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the oxidation potential parameter by selecting hypochlorite (E° = 0.89 V) as the oxidizing agent, which provides sufficient oxidation for ruthenium removal while being mild enough to prevent rapid copper oxidation, thereby achieving uniform removal rates across different materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The polishing composition is designed to have different reactivity toward different materials (ruthenium vs. copper) by controlling the oxidizing strength and pH, creating selective chemical action that removes ruthenium effectively while preserving copper uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If polishing compositions are designed for different device configurations, then polishing performance varies, but formulation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolishing performance for various device configurationsVSAvoidformulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal polishing composition formulation based on hypochlorite oxidizing agent and pH control that effectively polishes both ruthenium and copper-containing devices, eliminating the need for multiple specialized formulations for different device configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

By establishing universal parameter ranges (pH > 7, hypochlorite concentration, presence of corrosion inhibitors), the patent enables a single formulation to adapt to various device configurations without requiring complex formulation changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method provides robust polishing performance across various device configurations with improved ruthenium to copper selectivity and reduced toxicity, ensuring uniformity and safety in semiconductor substrate processing.

Implementation Method 1

chemical mechanical polishing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

chemical mechanical polishing composition comprising... 0.05 to 1 wt% sodium hypochlorite or potassium hypochlorite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

copper may be subject to galvanic attack by ruthenium when polishing certain device configurations using conventional ruthenium polishing compositions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGalvanic attack:

Data Source

PatentUS9299585B2Method for chemical mechanical polishing substrates containing ruthenium and copper
Publication Date: 2016.03.29 DUPONT ELECTRONIC MATERIALS HLDG INC
  • US9299585B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for chemical mechanical polishing of a substrate comprising ruthenium and copper is provided wherein the substrate is contacted with a polishing slurry containing an abrasive, hypochlorite, a copolymer of acrylic acid and methacrylic acid, benzotriazole, poly(methyl vinyl ether) and a non-ionic surfactant at a pH of 9 to 11.