Ruthenium Electrode for Hydrogen Evolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial electrolytic processes face challenges with high energy consumption, corrosion issues with carbon steel cathodes, and the high cost and limited lifetime of platinum-based electrodes, which are prone to damage from current reversals, necessitating a more cost-effective and durable cathode solution for hydrogen evolution.

Innovation Solution

A ruthenium nitrate-based precursor is used in a chloride-free acetic acid solution, applied in multiple coats on a metal substrate and subjected to thermal decomposition, incorporating rare earth elements and palladium for enhanced catalytic activity, stability, and tolerance to current reversals, offering a more reproducible and economically viable alternative.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If platinum-based catalytic coatings are used on nickel substrates, then cathodic overvoltage is reduced and catalytic activity is improved, but the cost increases and lifetime is limited due to poor adhesion and susceptibility to current reversal damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive platinum-based coatings with a cheaper ruthenium-based catalytic coating that can be applied as a thin layer (1-10 µm) through electrochemical deposition. The ruthenium coating provides sufficient catalytic activity at lower cost, accepting that it may require replacement after a certain service life, thus embodying the principle of using cheaper, shorter-lived materials to reduce overall system cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the catalytic coating by using ruthenium compounds (such as ruthenium chloride or ruthenium nitrate) instead of platinum compounds. The deposition process parameters are also optimized, including controlling the pH (3-7), temperature (20-80°C), and current density (1-10 A/dm²) to achieve the desired coating properties with improved cost-performance ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If carbon steel cathodes are used, then cost is reduced, but corrosion resistance deteriorates in caustic environments

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidcorrosion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite structure by depositing a ruthenium-based catalytic coating on a nickel substrate. The nickel substrate provides excellent corrosion resistance in caustic environments, while the ruthenium coating provides catalytic activity. This composite material approach allows the use of a cost-effective substrate material while maintaining reliability through the protective and functional coating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The nickel substrate serves multiple functions: it provides structural support, ensures corrosion resistance in the caustic electrolyte environment, and offers good adhesion for the ruthenium coating. This multi-functionality allows the system to achieve both low cost and high reliability without requiring separate components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Strength

If cerium is added to the catalytic layer formulation, then adhesion of the coating to the substrate is improved, but the electrode becomes more susceptible to damage from current reversals

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadhesionVSAvoidtolerance to current reversal
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes cerium from the ruthenium-based catalytic coating formulation. By excluding this specific element, the coating maintains good adhesion to the nickel substrate through the electrochemical deposition process itself, while avoiding the vulnerability to current reversal damage that cerium-containing coatings exhibit. This selective exclusion resolves the contradiction between adhesion and reversal tolerance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If two distinct phases are used in the coating (noble metal catalyst and protective palladium phase), then current reversal tolerance is improved, but the cost increases and preparation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent reversal toleranceVSAvoidcoating preparation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a single-phase ruthenium-based catalytic coating instead of a two-phase composite structure. The ruthenium coating inherently provides both catalytic activity and adequate protection against current reversal damage, eliminating the need for separate noble metal catalyst phase and protective palladium phase. This segmentation into a single functional phase simplifies the coating preparation process while maintaining the required reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The ruthenium-based electrode demonstrates superior catalytic activity, extended lifetime, and improved tolerance to current reversals, reducing overall costs and energy consumption while maintaining high performance in industrial electrolytic processes.

Implementation Method 1

A ruthenium nitrate-based precursor is used in a chloride-free acetic acid solution, applied in multiple coats on a metal substrate and subjected to thermal decomposition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

The electrolysis of alkali brines for the simultaneous production of chlorine and alkali and the electrochemical processes of hypochlorite and chlorate manufacturing are the most typical examples of industrial electrolytic applications where hydrogen is cathodically evolved

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrolysis: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 3

A ruthenium nitrate-based precursor is used in a chloride-free acetic acid solution, applied in multiple coats on a metal substrate and subjected to thermal decomposition, incorporating rare earth elements and palladium for enhanced catalytic activity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS9090983B2Electrode for electrochemical processes and method for obtaining the same
Publication Date: 2015.07.28 INDUSTRIE DE NORA SPA

AI summary

An electrode suitable for use as hydrogen-evolving cathode in electrolytic processes is obtained by thermal decomposition of a precursor consisting of an acetic solution of nitrates of ruthenium, and optionally of rare earths. The electrode displays a low cathodic hydrogen evolution overpotential, an improved tolerance to current reversal phenomena and a high duration in industrial operating conditions.