SA NSA Cell Differentiation via SIB Subcarrier Offset

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication systems face challenges in differentiating between standalone (SA) and non-standalone (NSA) cells, leading to increased latency and sub-optimal operating decisions for user equipment (UE) during cell selection and reselection operations.

Innovation Solution

The UE determines whether a cell is configured as an SA or NSA cell based on subcarrier offset and tracking area code (TAC) information received from system information blocks, allowing it to perform targeted cell selection and reselection operations, thereby avoiding NSA cells and reducing latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the UE attempts to camp on any cell without differentiation, then the cell selection process is simple, but the latency increases and network access efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatency for camping on cellVSAvoidcell selection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the UE read and analyze system information blocks (SIBs) before attempting to camp on a cell. The UE determines whether a cell is SA or NSA type in advance by checking SIB1 and other system information, allowing it to make informed cell selection decisions and avoid latency-causing failed camping attempts on incompatible cells

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses system information blocks (SIBs) as an intermediary to convey cell type information. The base station transmits SA/NSA cell indicators through SIB1 and other system information messages, which the UE reads to differentiate cell types without direct signaling overhead, thus reducing latency while maintaining manageable complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the UE performs detailed cell differentiation, then network access reliability improves, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork access reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption at UE
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by having the UE perform selective cell differentiation only when necessary for network access decisions. The UE reads system information blocks to determine cell type (SA/NSA) but does not continuously monitor or analyze all possible parameters, thereby achieving reliable network access while limiting unnecessary power consumption from excessive processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The UE performs self-service by autonomously determining cell type through reading system information blocks and applying local decision logic. The UE independently identifies SA vs NSA cells and makes camping decisions without requiring continuous network guidance, reducing signaling overhead and power consumption while maintaining reliable network access

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the UE avoids NSA cells through differentiation, then network access efficiency improves, but the cell selection process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork access efficiencyVSAvoidcell selection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the cell type identification function from the general cell selection process. By specifically extracting and analyzing the SA/NSA cell indicator from system information blocks, the UE can make targeted decisions to avoid NSA cells when SA cells are available, improving network access efficiency without requiring complete redesign of the cell selection mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the cell selection parameter by introducing cell type (SA/NSA) as a differentiating factor. The UE modifies its cell selection behavior based on the extracted cell type parameter from system information, enabling efficient avoidance of NSA cells while maintaining a structured and manageable selection process through parameter-based decision making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11800441B2Differentiation between standalone and non-standalone cells in a wireless communications system
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11800441B2 patent drawing
  • US11800441B2 patent drawing
  • US11800441B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems and devices for wireless communications are described for differentiation between standalone (SA) and non-standalone (NSA) cells in a wireless communications system. A user equipment (UE) may receive an indication of a subcarrier offset for a system information block (SIB). The SIB may be for a cell of a wireless communications network. The cell may be in accordance with a radio access technology. The UE may determine, based on the subcarrier offset for the SIB, whether the cell is configured as an SA cell or as an NSA cell for the radio access technology. The UE may communicate via the wireless communications network based on whether the cell is configured as an SA cell or as an NSA cell.