SaaS Portal Error Remediation via Group Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

SaaS platforms face inefficiencies in resolving runtime errors across multiple portals managed by the same service provider, leading to slow resolution times and increased effort and expense due to repetitive error troubleshooting.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that monitors activity data across a group of SaaS portals to detect runtime errors and proactively applies remediation measures, including bug fixes and configuration adjustments, to prevent errors from occurring in other portals within the group.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual error troubleshooting is performed separately for each portal, then error resolution can be customized for each portal, but resolution time increases and effort and expense increase due to repetitiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror resolution effectivenessVSAvoidresolution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring of activity data across portals to detect runtime errors before they propagate. By proactively identifying errors through continuous monitoring of logs, metrics, and events, the system can initiate remediation measures in advance, reducing the time required for manual detection and response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copy of the error state and remediation approach from one portal and applies it to other portals experiencing similar errors. By capturing error patterns from affected portals and replicating the troubleshooting and remediation process across the portal group, the system eliminates repetitive manual work while maintaining consistent error resolution effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If manual error troubleshooting is performed separately for each portal, then detailed attention can be given to each portal's specific context, but effort and expense increase due to repetitiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror resolution effectivenessVSAvoiddevelopment support efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal error detection and remediation platform that serves multiple portals simultaneously. By creating a multi-functional system capable of monitoring, detecting, and remediating errors across the entire portal group through centralized coordination, the system eliminates the need for separate manual troubleshooting processes for each portal, thereby reducing effort and expense while maintaining resolution effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables portals to self-diagnose and self remediate errors by automatically monitoring their own activity data and implementing remediation measures based on detected error patterns. This self-service capability reduces the need for manual intervention from development support teams, lowering effort and expense while maintaining reliable error resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If runtime errors are detected and remediated in one portal, then that portal's operability is restored, but without proactive measures, the same errors occur in other portals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveportal operabilityVSAvoiderror recurrence time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that capture error information from one portal and use it to prevent similar errors in other portals. By continuously monitoring activity data across the portal group and feeding error patterns back to the remediation system, the platform can proactively apply fixes to prevent error recurrence across all portals, reducing the time until error recurrence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary remediation across the portal group based on errors detected in one portal. By proactively applying remediation measures to all portals in the group before errors can propagate or recur, the system prevents error recurrence and reduces the time until the next error event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10680913B1Error remediation in software as a service (SaaS) portals
Publication Date: 2020.06.09 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US10680913B1 patent drawing
  • US10680913B1 patent drawing
  • US10680913B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples of error remediation in SaaS portals is disclosed. In an example, activity data in a SaaS portal is monitored, where the SaaS portal is from amongst a plurality of SaaS portals grouped in a portal group. The activity data includes a record of events associated with a service request processed by the SaaS portal, an alert notification on occurrence of an error in the SaaS portal, and user information relating to credentials provided by a user accessing the SaaS portal. A runtime error in the SaaS portal may be detected based on the monitored activity data. The runtime error is based on faults in a service or an Application Programming Interface (API) associated with the SaaS portal, a security vulnerability, and non-compliance with a configuration policy governing the SaaS portal. A remediation measure for the runtime error is determined and implemented in the portal group.