SaaS Portfolio Management System for Matrix Organization Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current portfolio and project management systems lack consistency and efficiency, particularly in large matrix organizational structures, leading to inconsistencies in reporting, decision-making, and resource management, which increases costs and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A Software as a Service (SaaS) portfolio management system that integrates risk-adjusted Integrated Master Schedules, utilizes TriCoBi modeling and simulation, and incorporates gamification, machine learning, and customizable project status updates to provide real-time data access and decision-making support across all stakeholders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional portfolio management systems are used in large matrix organizations, then each project can be managed independently with flexibility, but inconsistencies in reporting, decision-making, and resource management occur across projects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject management flexibilityVSAvoidreporting consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal portfolio management platform that serves multiple functions: project management, resource allocation, risk assessment, and reporting across the entire organization. This single system handles diverse project types and organizational structures while maintaining consistent reporting standards, eliminating the need for separate management approaches for different projects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments portfolio management into hierarchical levels (portfolio, program, project) with standardized reporting at each level. This segmentation allows projects to maintain operational flexibility while automatically aggregating data to higher levels for consistent organizational reporting, resolving the contradiction between project autonomy and organizational consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple independent project management tools are used, then each project can be customized to its specific needs, but data integration and real-time status reporting become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject customizationVSAvoiddata integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges previously separate project management functions into a single integrated platform. Projects can be customized within the system while automatically integrating data across all projects. The unified database and communication infrastructure eliminate information silos, ensuring real-time data availability for portfolio-level decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If manual resource allocation and tracking are used, then detailed control over individual projects is possible, but resource supply/demand data aggregation and waste identification become inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource tracking accuracyVSAvoiddata aggregation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback loops that continuously collect resource utilization data from individual projects and aggregate it to portfolio level. This feedback mechanism provides real-time visibility into resource supply and demand, enabling efficient identification of waste and optimization opportunities without sacrificing detailed tracking accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automatic resource allocation and tracking without requiring manual intervention for data aggregation. Resource data is automatically collected, validated, and aggregated across projects, freeing managers from manual compilation tasks while maintaining precise resource visibility at all levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of information

If detailed risk lists are provided to stakeholders, then comprehensive risk information is available, but confidence levels and overall project health become difficult to interpret

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk information completenessVSAvoiddecision-making clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms risk data from a single dimension (detailed risk lists) to multiple dimensions by aggregating risks into confidence levels and overall project health metrics. This dimensional transformation preserves complete risk information while adding interpretive layers that make data actionable for stakeholders, enabling both comprehensive analysis and quick decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

5Reliability

If traditional project management approaches are used, then established processes are followed, but near-real-time dashboard updates and automated status reporting are not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess reliabilityVSAvoidstatus update speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous automated data collection and dashboard updates that run without interruption. Project status, resource utilization, and risk metrics are continuously refreshed from source systems, providing near-real-time visibility while maintaining reliable data quality through automated validation and error handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11354121B2Software portfolio management system and method
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 AURORA ANN LLC
  • US11354121B2 patent drawing
  • US11354121B2 patent drawing
  • US11354121B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A software-based product development portfolio management system and method that may be implemented using a software as a service (SaaS) model that allows users (based on access rights) to: create and update valid project plans using integrated management tools and techniques, view near-real-time project data and metrics; enable lean project management; send messages to other users via system alerts and/or e-mails and receive messages/alerts from other SPM System users; input data; establish and change organizational governance guidelines; and approve, conditionally approve or reject decisions.