SaaS Security Configuration Categorization for Cross-App Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing SSPM approaches struggle with efficiently managing security settings across multiple SaaS apps, leading to inefficiencies, security blind spots, and difficulty in maintaining compliance and uniform policy enforcement due to the lack of a holistic overview and scalable security evaluation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for providing security controls across SaaS apps by categorizing configuration settings into predetermined categories and subcategories, automatically analyzing compliance with security policies, generating alerts for violations, and enabling one-click remediation, using a cloud-based security service with a network gateway to enforce policies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing SSPM approaches are used to manage security settings across multiple SaaS apps, then security management can be performed, but efficiency is low and security blind spots occur due to lack of holistic overview

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity management efficiencyVSAvoidsecurity coverage completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments security configuration settings into predetermined categories (e.g., authentication, authorization, data protection) and subcategories. This segmentation enables systematic evaluation of each SaaS app's security posture while maintaining a holistic view across all applications, thereby improving both management efficiency and security coverage completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal security evaluation framework that works across multiple different SaaS applications simultaneously. By establishing common categories and compliance rules that can be applied universally to various SaaS apps, the system achieves efficient centralized management while maintaining comprehensive security coverage across diverse applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If manual security compliance checking is performed across multiple SaaS apps, then detailed security evaluation can be achieved, but administrative effort and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity compliance evaluation accuracyVSAvoidadministrative time consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes predetermined security categories, subcategories, and compliance rules in advance before actual security evaluation is needed. This preliminary structuring of security frameworks enables automated, efficient compliance checking across multiple SaaS apps without requiring manual configuration during each evaluation, thereby maintaining high evaluation accuracy while reducing administrative time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automated self-evaluation of security compliance by comparing SaaS app configuration settings against the predetermined security categories and rules. This automated self-service mechanism eliminates the need for manual administrative intervention in each compliance check, significantly reducing time consumption while maintaining precise security evaluation through systematic categorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If security policies are enforced across diverse SaaS apps, then uniform security control can be achieved, but device complexity and implementation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy enforcement uniformityVSAvoidsecurity system implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing security policies to be enforced at the level of specific configuration settings within predetermined categories. Each SaaS app's security settings are evaluated and controlled locally within its relevant category context, enabling uniform policy enforcement across diverse applications while keeping implementation complexity manageable through localized, category-specific rule application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If comprehensive security settings are monitored across all SaaS apps, then security blind spots are eliminated, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity monitoring completenessVSAvoidsecurity system structural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments comprehensive security monitoring into structured predetermined categories and subcategories. By organizing security settings systematically across categories such as authentication, authorization, and data protection, the system achieves complete security monitoring coverage while managing complexity through hierarchical organization and standardized evaluation frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12537857B2Security controls across SaaS apps
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC
  • US12537857B2 patent drawing
  • US12537857B2 patent drawing
  • US12537857B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various techniques for security controls across SaaS apps are disclosed. In some embodiments, a system/method/computer program product for providing security controls across SaaS apps includes collecting configuration settings for each of a plurality of Software as a Service (SaaS) applications (apps) for a SaaS security service, wherein the configuration settings are related to security for one or more of the plurality of SaaS apps; grouping each of the configuration settings into one of a plurality of categories and one of a plurality of subcategories; and determining that a configuration setting associated with at least one of the plurality of SaaS apps is not in compliance with a rule of a security policy.