Centralized SaaS Security Enforcement Platform

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current SaaS platforms lack a uniform and centralized solution for monitoring and enforcing security across multiple platforms, leading to inconsistent security features and increased risks due to unauthorized file sharing, inadequate configuration of security settings, and excessive user privileges.

Innovation Solution

A centralized security enforcement platform that integrates with multiple SaaS platforms to enforce control policies, monitor file sharing activities, and automate security verification, enabling dynamic access control and plugin management through bi-directional communication and user-based verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized security enforcement platform is implemented to enforce control policies across multiple SaaS platforms, then security consistency and policy enforcement capability are improved, but system complexity and integration requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a centralized security enforcement platform that acts as an intermediary between multiple SaaS platforms and security control policies. This platform receives security events from various SaaS platforms, enforces control policies centrally, and manages security configurations uniformly across all connected platforms, thereby achieving security consistency without requiring each SaaS platform to implement identical security mechanisms independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual monitoring of security events across multiple SaaS accounts is performed, then flexibility in handling diverse platform-specific security issues is maintained, but time consumption and human error risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling flexibilityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The security enforcement platform enables automated self-service monitoring and response to security events. The system automatically receives security events from multiple SaaS platforms, evaluates them against defined control policies, and executes appropriate responses without requiring manual human intervention for each security event, thereby eliminating time consumption and human error while maintaining adaptability through configurable policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The platform implements automated feedback loops where security events are continuously monitored, evaluated against control policies, and trigger automatic responses. The system provides real-time feedback on security compliance status and enforces policy violations automatically, replacing manual monitoring with an automated feedback-driven security management system that reduces time consumption while maintaining versatility through policy configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If security teams manually monitor and manipulate content controls on each SaaS account, then detailed control over platform-specific security features is achieved, but operational efficiency and scalability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol granularityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized security enforcement platform provides universal multi-functional capabilities that work across multiple SaaS platforms through a single system. It can enforce various types of control policies (file sharing, data loss prevention, access control, etc.) across different platforms without requiring separate manual operations for each platform, thereby achieving both control granularity through configurable policies and operational efficiency through centralized automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the security monitoring and control operations for multiple SaaS platforms into a single centralized platform. Instead of security teams manually monitoring and manipulating controls on each individual SaaS account separately, the system combines all security operations into one unified platform that manages multiple platforms simultaneously, improving operational efficiency while maintaining detailed control through policy configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If uniform security policies are enforced across multiple SaaS platforms through a centralized system, then security vulnerability reduction is improved, but compatibility challenges across different platform protocols increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity vulnerabilityVSAvoidplatform compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized security enforcement platform serves as an intermediary layer between uniform security policies and diverse SaaS platform protocols. It receives security events from various platforms using their respective protocols, translates them into a standardized internal format, enforces control policies uniformly, and sends responses back to the appropriate platforms, thereby reducing security vulnerabilities through consistent policy enforcement while maintaining compatibility with different platform protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12021901B2Systems and methods for verifying and enforcing cybersecurity control policies across SaaS platforms
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 DOCONTROL INC
  • US12021901B2 patent drawing
  • US12021901B2 patent drawing
  • US12021901B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to techniques for enforcing control policies on one more software as a service (SaaS) platforms from a centralized security control platform. An integration component is configured to integrate SaaS accounts with the security enforcement platform. The security enforcement platform executes functions that facilitate the creation of control policies on SaaS accounts. Exemplary control polices can be created to manage or control file sharing activities, user authentication, plugin usage, and/or other functions and features that may impact the security of the files or content included on the SaaS accounts. Activity events generated by the integrated SaaS accounts can be monitored by the security control platform. The activity events monitored by the security enforcement platform can be utilized to enforce the control policies and facilitate verification of file sharing activities.