Oculomotor TBI Detection via Saccadic Velocity Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods fail to detect minor traumatic brain injury effectively, leading to undetected injuries in sports participants and military personnel, which can result in further trauma and significant societal costs.

Innovation Solution

A noninvasive method involving a visual stimulus with predetermined movement across the visual field, monitoring eye movement with a sensor device, and analyzing the fast eye velocity component to determine if minor traumatic brain injury has occurred, using a computer to process and compare the eye movement data with predetermined numerical values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If current detection methods are used, then detection capability for major injuries is maintained, but detection of minor traumatic brain injury fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidinjury detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the detection parameter from general physical inspection to specific oculomotor function measurement. By measuring saccadic eye movement parameters (velocity, amplitude, duration) in response to visual stimuli, the system detects subtle neurological impairments indicative of minor TBI that are invisible to conventional inspection methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical/physical inspection methods with optical and computational measurement systems. A camera records eye movements, and computer algorithms analyze the kinematic parameters of saccadic movements, substituting subjective visual assessment with objective digital measurement and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive medical examination is performed, then detection accuracy improves, but time consumption and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjury detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by focusing measurement on a specific, highly sensitive indicator of TBI (saccadic eye movement parameters) rather than performing comprehensive full-body examinations. This targeted approach captures the essential diagnostic information needed for minor TBI detection in a fraction of the time required for complete medical workups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the detection process into isolated, measurable components: presenting visual stimuli, recording eye movements with a camera, extracting saccadic parameters through image processing, and comparing against thresholds. This segmentation enables rapid automated analysis without requiring lengthy comprehensive examinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If specialized medical equipment is used, then detection precision improves, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeye movement measurement accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs automated self-service through computer vision algorithms that automatically track eye position, detect saccadic movements, calculate kinematic parameters, and compare results against predetermined thresholds. This eliminates the need for trained operators to manually measure and interpret eye movements, reducing operational complexity while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a standard camera and computer system—common, readily available devices—to perform the specialized function of oculomotor analysis. By making the detection system compatible with ordinary digital cameras and computers, it achieves medical-grade measurement capability without requiring complex specialized equipment or extensive training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If trained medical personnel are required, then diagnostic accuracy improves, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis by automatically comparing measured saccadic parameters against predetermined thresholds and generating diagnostic conclusions without requiring trained medical personnel. The computer executes the full diagnostic algorithm, from data acquisition to interpretation, making the system operable by non-specialists while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates automated feedback mechanisms where measurement results are immediately compared against established criteria, and diagnostic outcomes are automatically generated and displayed. This closed-loop feedback system eliminates the need for expert interpretation, allowing untrained users to obtain reliable diagnostic information through simple operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10743808B2Method and associated apparatus for detecting minor traumatic brain injury
Publication Date: 2020.08.18 SPRYSON INC
  • US10743808B2 patent drawing
  • US10743808B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Minor traumatic brain injury is detected by operating (a) an image generator for presenting a visual stimulus having a predetermined movement across a visual field of a subject and (b) a sensor device for monitoring fast eye movement of the subject while the subject views the stimulus. The sensor device generates a signal encoding the subject's eye position. A computer or microprocessor operatively connected to the sensor device is configured for determining a magnitude for the fast eye velocity component.