Sacrificial SiGe Fin Integration for Sub-Lithographic Pitch Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge is to increase the density of semiconductor devices using fins while maintaining desirable electrical characteristics and efficiently integrating them with planar transistors, as existing technologies face limitations in minimum fin spacing and facet control.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming a sacrificial silicon germanium (SiGe) fin over a silicon seed layer, growing epitaxial silicon on its sides, and then removing the SiGe fin to create two silicon fins with controlled width and spacing, allowing for sub-lithographic pitch and reduced faceting, thereby doubling the density and improving integration with planar transistors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional lithographic fin spacing is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but device density is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fin formation process is segmented into multiple stages: forming sacrificial fins, depositing spacers, selectively removing sacrificial fins, and forming final fins. This segmentation enables sub-lithographic pitch and higher density while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standardized process modules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Sacrificial fins are formed in advance as placeholders to define the final fin positions. The spacer material is deposited beforehand to establish the minimum pitch constraints. These preliminary structures guide subsequent processing steps to achieve the desired high-density fin configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Quantity of substance

If fin spacing is reduced to increase density, then device density improves, but facet control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidfacet control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

A spacer layer acts as an intermediary between the sacrificial fin and the final fin structure. This spacer provides a controlled thickness that defines the minimum pitch and ensures uniform fin spacing, thereby maintaining facet control even at reduced pitch dimensions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The method changes the critical dimension control parameter from lithographic resolution to spacer layer thickness. By controlling the spacer deposition parameters (such as conformal deposition thickness), precise fin spacing and facet control are achieved independent of lithographic limitations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If more fins are integrated to increase density, then device density improves, but integration with planar transistors becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidintegration ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the substrate are assigned different fin configurations: regions with sacrificial fins produce high-density fin transistors, while regions without sacrificial fins produce planar transistors. This local differentiation enables mixed technology integration while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through region-specific processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the formation of densely packed semiconductor devices with improved electrical characteristics and efficient integration of fin transistors with planar transistors, achieving higher density and reduced leakage by utilizing the sacrificial SiGe fin process.

Implementation Method 1

Epitaxial silicon is grown on the sides of the SiGe fin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEpitaxy: Epitaxy

Data Source

PatentUS7851340B2Semiconductor fin integration using a sacrificial fin
Publication Date: 2010.12.14 NXP USA INC
  • US7851340B2 patent drawing
  • US7851340B2 patent drawing
  • US7851340B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is a method for forming a semiconductor device. Portions of a sacrificial layer are removed to expose a first seed layer region. The first seed layer region corresponds to a first semiconductor region, and a remaining portion of the sacrificial layer corresponds to a second semiconductor region. An epitaxial semiconductor material is deposited over the first seed layer region. A capping layer is formed to overlie the epitaxial semiconductor material and the remaining portion of the sacrificial layer. Portions of the capping layer are removed to form a capping structure that overlies a part of the remaining portion of the sacrificial layer. Portions of the sacrificial layer not covered by the capping structure are removed to form a sacrificial structure having sidewalls. Fin structures are formed adjoining the sidewalls by depositing a semiconductor material along the sidewalls. Portions of the capping structure are removed to expose portions of sacrificial layer between adjacent fin structures. Portions of the sacrificial material between the adjacent fin structures are removed.