Lockable Enclosure Imaging for Secure Safe Content Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hotel safes lack efficient and secure methods to determine their contents after guest departure, leading to potential theft and disputes, while existing systems are energy-inefficient and costly due to manual battery replacement and limited audit trails.

Innovation Solution

A system with a lockable enclosure equipped with an image acquisition device, storage element, and controller that captures and securely stores images of the safe's interior, allowing access only under predetermined conditions, enabling remote monitoring and reducing energy consumption by selectively transmitting images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual inspection of safe contents is performed after guest departure, then security against theft is improved, but labor cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures an image of the safe interior before the safe is opened for inspection. This preliminary action records the contents state in advance, eliminating the need for physical inspection and allowing remote verification of safe contents without sending personnel to the location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital copy (image) of the safe interior contents and transmits it to a remote location. This copy serves as evidence of contents without requiring physical access, replacing the need for manual inspection with image-based verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If multiple staff members are deployed to inspect locked safes, then security against theft is improved, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system transmits a digital copy of the safe interior image to a remote location where multiple staff members can review it simultaneously. This eliminates the need to physically deploy multiple personnel to the safe location, reducing travel time and operational costs while maintaining security through collective verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The image transmission system acts as an intermediary, allowing multiple staff members to remotely view and verify safe contents without physically being present at the safe. This mediator enables collaborative security verification while eliminating the costs associated with deploying multiple personnel to the location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If audit trail reports are generated from existing electronic safe systems, then information about locking events is obtained, but information about safe contents is not provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safe system is enhanced with multi-functionality by integrating image capture and transmission capabilities alongside the existing locking mechanism. This allows the same device to perform both security locking and content documentation functions, providing comprehensive information (both locking events and contents) without requiring separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system captures the image of safe contents in advance, before any potential disputes arise. This preliminary documentation provides complete information about what was stored, complementing the audit trail of locking events with visual evidence of contents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If electronic systems continuously monitor safe status, then security monitoring is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous monitoring, the system uses periodic action by capturing an image at specific trigger events (such as when the safe is locked or opened). This event-driven approach maintains security monitoring capability while consuming energy only when necessary, rather than continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the necessary information (image of contents) at critical moments rather than continuously monitoring all parameters. This selective extraction of needed information reduces energy consumption while maintaining adequate security monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10072454B1Lockable enclosure and system and method for operating the same
Publication Date: 2018.09.11 INNOVATIVE HOSPITALITY CONCEPTS INC
  • US10072454B1 patent drawing
  • US10072454B1 patent drawing
  • US10072454B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for securing personal articles, including a lockable enclosure, an image acquisition device disposed to capture an image of an interior of the lockable enclosure, a storage element configured to store the image, a data transmission element configured to transfer the image to a network, and a controller configured to grant access to the image only upon fulfillment of a predetermined condition, where the image acquisition device, the storage element, the data transmission element, and the controller are disposed in communication with one another and with the network.