Safe-Distance Vehicle Navigation Using Stopping Distance Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous vehicle navigation systems face challenges in ensuring safety and scalability, as they need to process various sensory data, navigate through complex environments, and adhere to liability constraints, while existing solutions lack a standardized, interpretable mathematical model for safety assurance.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a multi-camera configuration with processing units that perform monocular and stereo image analysis, combining data from cameras, radar, and lidar to detect objects, navigate, and respond to environmental changes, using a trained system for decision-making and reinforcement learning to optimize navigation policies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous vehicle navigation systems process multiple sensory data sources and complex environmental information to ensure safety, then the reliability of navigation decisions improves, but the device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety assuranceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The navigation system is divided into modular components: hazard detection module, liability rule module, and navigation decision module. Each module processes specific aspects of safety independently, allowing the system to maintain high reliability through specialized processing while managing complexity through functional separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Liability rules and safety constraints are pre-programmed into the navigation system before operation. The system pre-processes sensory data to identify potential hazards and pre-determines acceptable navigation actions based on predetermined liability standards, reducing real-time computational complexity while maintaining safety assurance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the navigation system adheres to standardized safety assurance requirements and liability rules, then the reliability and interpretability improve, but the flexibility in navigating complex dynamic environments may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety assuranceVSAvoidnavigation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The navigation system dynamically adjusts its decision-making process by continuously evaluating current environmental conditions against predetermined liability rules. The system can adapt its navigation path in real-time while maintaining compliance with safety standards, allowing flexibility within constrained boundaries defined by liability requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as speed, distance to other vehicles, and navigation path based on dynamic environmental assessment while maintaining adherence to liability rules. By adjusting these parameters within safety-defined limits, the system achieves both reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system uses multiple cameras and advanced image processing for object detection, then the measurement precision of object positions improves, but the use of energy and computational resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-camera system is designed to serve multiple functions: primary object detection, depth estimation, and environmental mapping. By making each camera system multi-functional, the system achieves high measurement precision without requiring additional dedicated sensors, thereby managing energy consumption more efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical sensor arrays with sophisticated image processing algorithms that analyze data from standard cameras. This substitution allows achieving high measurement precision through computational methods rather than through increased hardware complexity and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3842303B1Systems and methods for navigating with safe distances
Publication Date: 2024.05.15 MOBILEYE VISION TECH LTD
  • EP3842303B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3842303B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3842303B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for navigating a host vehicle. In one implementation, at least one processing device may be programmed to receive an image representative of an environment of the host vehicle, determine a planned navigational action for the host vehicle, analyze the image to identify a target vehicle with a direction of travel toward the host vehicle, and determine a next-state distance between the host vehicle and the target vehicle that would result if the planned navigational action was taken. The at least one processing device may further determine a stopping distance for the host vehicle based on a braking rate, a maximum acceleration capability, and a current speed of the host vehicle, determine a stopping distance for the target vehicle based on a braking rate, a maximum acceleration capability, and a current speed of the target vehicle, and implement the planned navigational action if the determined next-state distance is greater than a sum of the stopping distances for the host vehicle and the target vehicle.