Safe Dynamic Model Training With Gaussian Process Exploration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Active learning for time series models representing physical systems faces challenges in safely exploring dynamic processes without damaging the systems, as existing methods lack effective criteria for balancing information gain and safety during dynamic stimulation.

Innovation Solution

The method combines dynamic, active, and safe exploration by using Gaussian processes with a non-linear exogenous structure, parameterizing input curves as successive sections of ramp or step functions, and solving an optimization problem with secondary safety conditions to maximize information gain while ensuring system safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If dynamic stimulation is applied to explore the input area of a physical system, then information gain about dynamic processes is improved, but the risk of damaging the physical system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation gainVSAvoidsystem damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A safety model is trained beforehand to predict unsafe input areas before actual exploration occurs. This preliminary safety assessment allows the active learning process to avoid dangerous regions proactively, enabling aggressive exploration in safe regions without risking system damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The safety model acts as an intermediary between the active learning process and the physical system. It receives exploration requests, evaluates them for safety, and only permits safe inputs to reach the physical system, thus mediating the conflict between information gathering and system protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If selective data identification is performed in a static state, then measurement precision is improved, but the ability to detect dynamic processes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata identification accuracyVSAvoiddynamic process detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static to dynamic exploration by sequentially determining curve sections based on previous observations. The input curve is adapted dynamically through an explorative approach that responds to system behavior, allowing both precise measurement and dynamic process detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The exploration process continues continuously by appending successive curve sections to form a complete input curve. This continuous explorative action maintains both measurement precision through selective data identification and dynamic process detection through ongoing adaptation to system responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If more pieces of information are collected from the physical system, then model accuracy is improved, but the cost and risk of measurements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The safety model extracts and isolates the safety assessment function from the main active learning process. By separating safety evaluation, the system can efficiently identify and avoid unsafe measurement points without compromising model accuracy, reducing unnecessary measurement costs and risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameterization of input curves from fixed pre-defined curves to dynamically determined successive sections. This parameter change allows the exploration to adapt to system responses, collecting maximum information with minimum measurements by focusing on informative regions identified through the safety model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11514268B2Method for the safe training of a dynamic model
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11514268B2 patent drawing
  • US11514268B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for the safe, active training of a computer-aided model for modeling time series of a physical system using Gaussian processes, including the steps of establishing a safety threshold value α; initializing by implementing safe initial curves as input values on the system, creating an initial regression model and an initial safety model; repeatedly carrying out the steps of updating the regression model; updating the safety model; determining a new curve section; implementing the determined new curve section on the physical system and measuring output variables; incorporating the new output values in the regression model and the safety model until N passes have been carried out; and outputting the regression model and the safety model.