Safe Parameterization for IEC 61508 Electronic Appliances

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for safe parameterization of electronic appliances, such as drives and PLCs, require manual confirmation of parameter values after download, which is prone to errors and overlooks potential data corruption due to the large number of parameters and user fatigue, especially in high-concentration configurations.

Innovation Solution

A method where parameter values are selected and stored in a memory accessible by a control device, allowing for verification and checksum calculation before and after transmission to the appliance, ensuring safe data storage and transmission through automated processes, eliminating the need for user-based confirmation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual confirmation of each parameter is required after download, then data corruption can be detected, but user errors and oversight increase due to large number of parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of data corruptionVSAvoiduser confirmation process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-verification by automatically reading back parameters from the electronic appliance and comparing them with the original parameter set. The control device autonomously detects data corruption without requiring manual user confirmation, thereby maintaining reliability while eliminating user fatigue and errors associated with manual checking of numerous parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where parameters are read back from the electronic appliance after download and automatically compared with the original parameter set stored in the control device. This closed-loop feedback system detects transmission errors and data corruption automatically, replacing the manual confirmation process and improving both reliability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If explicit agreement function or handwritten documentation is used for each parameter, then user-based confirmation is ensured, but time consumption and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter confirmationVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/manual process of explicit agreement functions and handwritten documentation with an automated digital verification system. The control device automatically reads back parameters from the electronic appliance, compares them with the original parameter set, and detects discrepancies electronically, thereby eliminating time-consuming manual processes while maintaining parameter confirmation reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-verification by automatically comparing transmitted parameters with the original parameter set without requiring user intervention for each parameter. This automated self-service approach ensures parameter confirmation reliability while dramatically reducing the time required for configuration compared to manual methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If parameters are transmitted via communication channel, then configuration can be performed remotely, but data corruption during transmission cannot be precluded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote configurationVSAvoiddata integrity during transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent stores the original parameter set in the control device's memory before transmission to the electronic appliance. This preliminary storage creates a reference copy that remains in the control device, enabling subsequent automatic verification of transmitted parameters by comparing them against this pre-stored original set, thereby ensuring data integrity during remote configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback verification mechanism where parameters are automatically read back from the electronic appliance after transmission and compared with the original parameter set stored in the control device. This feedback loop detects transmission errors and data corruption automatically, maintaining reliability while enabling remote configuration through communication channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7912990B2Method and apparatus for safe parameterization in accordance with IEC 61508 SIL 1 to 3 or EN 954-1 categories 1 to 4
Publication Date: 2011.03.22 KW SOFTWARE
  • US7912990B2 patent drawing
  • US7912990B2 patent drawing
  • US7912990B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method and an apparatus for safe parameterization in accordance with IEC 61508 SIL 1 to 3 or EN 954-1 Categories 1 to 4 of safe electronic appliances.One object of the invention is to describe a way which overcomes the explicit reading back of the parameters from the safe electronic appliance and confirmation of each of these parameters by the user.For this purpose, the invention proposes that parameter values which are intended for parameterization, are selected or entered via a user interface of an electronic control device and are then transmitted to the electronic appliance, to be kept in at least one memory which can be accessed by the control device, and be read back at least once from the memory for verification of the safe parameterization.