Transverse Stabilization Control Using a Safe Setpoint Direction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional transverse stabilization systems in vehicles rely solely on the steering direction, which can lead to unsafe stabilization interventions if the driver or assistance system steers the vehicle into an unsafe direction.

Innovation Solution

The method incorporates a safe setpoint direction in addition to the steering direction to determine the transverse stabilization target, thereby preventing the system from contributing to unsafe vehicle movements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the transverse stabilization system uses only the steering direction as the stabilization target, then the system response is simple and fast, but the vehicle may be stabilized in an unsafe direction causing accidents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of stabilization interventionVSAvoidcomplexity of stabilization target determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary component (the setpoint direction calculation unit) that processes the relationship between steering direction and road geometry. This intermediary calculates a safe setpoint direction by considering the road boundary and obstacle information, acting as a mediator between the driver's steering input and the stabilization system's actual target, thereby ensuring safety without requiring complete system redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the steering direction and comparing it with the calculated setpoint direction derived from road geometry and obstacle data. When deviations are detected, the stabilization system uses this feedback information to adjust the stabilization target, creating a closed-loop control that enhances safety while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the transverse stabilization system calculates a setpoint direction based on road geometry and obstacles, then the stabilization safety is improved, but the calculation complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of stabilization interventionVSAvoidprocessing time for stabilization target determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations of the setpoint direction based on pre-acquired road geometry and obstacle data before stabilization interventions are needed. By pre-processing the environmental information and establishing the relationship between steering input and safe trajectory in advance, the system reduces real-time computational burden while maintaining high safety standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The stabilization target determination is made dynamic by adapting the calculation complexity based on the driving situation. The system dynamically adjusts the level of detail in setpoint direction calculation according to the urgency and severity of the stabilization need, optimizing the balance between processing time and safety assurance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the transverse stabilization system overrides the steering direction with a calculated setpoint direction, then the vehicle is prevented from moving in unsafe directions, but the driver's steering control is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of unsafe vehicle movementVSAvoiddriver steering control freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by preparing the setpoint direction calculation based on road geometry and obstacle information before any unsafe steering occurs. This pre-established safety framework allows the system to gently guide the vehicle back to the safe trajectory through calculated stabilization moments rather than forceful override, maintaining driver control while preventing unsafe movements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The stabilization system applies partial action by intervening only in the degree necessary to return the vehicle to the safe setpoint direction rather than completely overriding the driver's steering input. The stabilization moment is calculated as a corrective component that works alongside the driver's steering, providing just enough intervention to ensure safety while preserving driver autonomy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12325412B2Method and control unit for operating a transverse stabilization system of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.06.10 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US12325412B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a transverse stabilization system of a vehicle. A steering direction of the vehicle and a setpoint direction of the vehicle are read in, with a transverse stabilization target for the transverse stabilization system being determined using the steering direction and the setpoint direction.