Automated Vehicle Safe-Stop-Zone Mapping Controller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to effectively navigate vehicles into safe-stop-zones during emergency situations, particularly when human operators are incapacitated or unable to assume control, and there is a need for a system that can autonomously identify and guide vehicles to safe areas for stopping without causing traffic hazards or congestion.

Innovation Solution

A safe-stop-zone mapping system that includes a digital map and a controller, which communicates to navigate the vehicle into a designated safe area, utilizing GPS, optical recognition, and wireless communication to identify and update safe zones, ensuring safe stopping without obstructing traffic or communication signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the vehicle stops on the roadway during an emergency situation, then the vehicle can quickly halt, but it causes traffic hazards and congestion

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidtraffic hazards and congestion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the stopping function from the main roadway by identifying and navigating to dedicated safe-stop-zones (shoulders, parking lots, rest areas) where vehicles can halt without interfering with through-traffic. This separates the emergency stopping need from the traffic flow path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The safe-stop-zone acts as an intermediary location between the roadway and complete vehicle shutdown. It provides a buffer zone where vehicles can stop temporarily during emergencies without directly impacting traffic flow, mediating between the need to stop and the need to maintain traffic movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the operator is required to assume manual control during an emergency, then human judgment can be applied, but the operator may be incapacitated or unprepared

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making capabilityVSAvoidoperator readiness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically identifying safe-stop-zones and navigating the vehicle there before the operator needs to make decisions. The controller proactively manages the emergency response by autonomously guiding the vehicle to safety, eliminating the need for immediate operator intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated-vehicle performs self-service during emergencies by autonomously detecting safe-stop-zones and navigating to them without human assistance. The system serves its own safety needs by maintaining capability for autonomous operation even when the operator is incapacitated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the vehicle navigates to a safe-stop-zone autonomously, then operator intervention is not needed, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves multiple functions: it manages normal vehicle operation, detects emergency situations, identifies safe-stop-zones using digital-map data, and executes navigation to those zones. This multi-functionality consolidates complex capabilities into a single control system rather than requiring separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The digital-map is pre-populated with safe-stop-zone locations and characteristics before emergencies occur. The system prepares navigation data and identifies accessible stopping locations in advance, so that during an emergency, the controller can quickly execute pre-planned routing without complex real-time decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9927810B1Automated-vehicle safe-stop-zone mapping system
Publication Date: 2018.03.27 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US9927810B1 patent drawing
  • US9927810B1 patent drawing
  • US9927810B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A safe-stop-zone mapping system suitable for use on an automated-vehicle includes a digital-map and a controller. The digital-map indicates a travel-path suitable for travel by a host-vehicle. The digital-map also indicates a safe-stop-zone proximate to the travel-path. The controller is in communication with the digital-map. The controller is configured to navigate the host-vehicle into the safe-stop-zone when an emergency-situation occurs.