Safe-to-proceed system for automated vehicle intersection entry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated vehicles face challenges in safely navigating intersections due to the assumption that other vehicles will stop, especially under adverse road conditions, leading to potential collisions.

Innovation Solution

A safe-to-proceed system equipped with an intersection-detector and vehicle-detector, communicating with a controller to prevent the host-vehicle from entering the intersection if the other-vehicle's stopping-distance indicates it will not stop, utilizing sensors like cameras, lidar, and radar, along with V2X communications to assess and manage the situation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the automated vehicle assumes other vehicles will stop at the intersection, then the host-vehicle can proceed more efficiently, but the risk of collision increases under adverse road conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintersection throughput efficiencyVSAvoidcollision avoidance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors other vehicles' positions, speeds, and stopping distances using sensors (cameras, lidar, radar) and V2X communications, providing real-time feedback to dynamically adjust whether the host vehicle can safely proceed through the intersection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

V2X communication systems act as intermediaries to exchange safety information between vehicles and infrastructure, enabling the host vehicle to receive advance warning about other vehicles' inability to stop without direct visual observation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the host-vehicle waits for other vehicles to stop before entering the intersection, then collision risk is reduced, but traffic flow efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of intersection entryVSAvoidintersection throughput efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of other vehicles' stopping capabilities using detected parameters (speed, distance, road conditions) before the host vehicle reaches the intersection, allowing early decision-making about whether to proceed or wait

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the host vehicle's behavior based on real-time conditions, switching between proceeding and waiting modes according to the assessed safety margin of other vehicles' stopping distances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If the automated vehicle uses multiple sensors and V2X communications to accurately assess other vehicles' stopping distance, then collision prevention improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestopping-distance estimation accuracyVSAvoiddetection and communication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges data from multiple sensors (cameras, lidar, radar) and V2X communication sources into a unified stopping-distance estimation, using sensor fusion to achieve high measurement precision while managing complexity through integrated processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively prevents collisions by accurately determining the stopping-distance and threat level of other vehicles, allowing the host-vehicle to wait or proceed safely, enhancing driving safety and reducing the risk of accidents.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing sensors like cameras, lidar, and radar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Implementation Method 2

utilizing sensors like cameras, lidar, and radar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 3

utilizing sensors like cameras, lidar, and radar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Implementation Method 4

utilizing sensors like cameras, lidar, and radar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Data Source

PatentUS11087624B2Safe-to-proceed system for an automated vehicle
Publication Date: 2021.08.10 MOTIONAL AD LLC
  • US11087624B2 patent drawing
  • US11087624B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A safe-to-proceed system (10) for operating an automated vehicle proximate to an intersection (14) includes an intersection-detector (18), a vehicle-detector (20), and a controller (24). The intersection-detector (18) is suitable for use on a host-vehicle (12). The intersection-detector (18) is used to determine when a host-vehicle (12) is proximate to an intersection (14). The vehicle-detector (20) is also suitable for use on the host-vehicle (12). The vehicle-detector (20) is used to estimate a stopping-distance (22) of an other-vehicle (16) approaching the intersection (14). The controller (24) is in communication with the intersection-detector (18) and the vehicle-detector (20). The controller (24) is configured to prevent the host-vehicle (12) from entering the intersection (14) when the stopping-distance (22) indicates that the other-vehicle (16) will enter the intersection (14) before stopping.