Safety Circuit Fuse Mechanism for Switch Failure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety circuits for electrical products are complex and costly due to their design, requiring numerous components and complex switching logic, which can lead to inefficiencies and increased production costs.

Innovation Solution

A simplified safety circuit design using a parallel configuration with a load and a microprocessor-controlled switch that automatically deactivates power to the load if the second switch fails to open, preventing overheating by blowing a fuse and interrupting power flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If prior safety circuits use complex coordinated switching logic, timing circuits and testing circuits, then safety function is achieved, but device complexity and production cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety functionVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates complex timing circuits, testing circuits, and coordinated switching logic from traditional safety circuits. The simplified design uses only a fuse, a load, and a power control switch, removing unnecessary components while maintaining safety functionality through a straightforward fuse-blown mechanism that detects switch failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using complex active monitoring and control logic to detect switch failures, the patent inverts the approach by using a passive fuse that automatically responds to abnormal current conditions. The safety mechanism works by allowing the fuse to blow under failure conditions rather than requiring active detection and response circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If prior safety circuits include numerous circuit components, then safety coverage is comprehensive, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety coverageVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes numerous expensive circuit components including timing circuits, testing circuits, and complex switching logic. The resulting design uses only three basic components (fuse, load, power control switch), dramatically reducing bill of materials cost while maintaining essential safety coverage through the fuse's automatic response to overcurrent conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a fuse as the primary safety component, which is a low-cost, disposable element designed to fail safely by blowing when abnormal conditions occur. This approach replaces expensive reusable electronic safety circuits with an inexpensive sacrificial component that provides reliable safety coverage at minimal cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the second switch fails to open when commanded, then power continues to the load causing overheating, but the safety circuit prevents this by blowing the fuse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverheating preventionVSAvoidsafety circuit components
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of continuous power flow (when the switch fails to open) into a beneficial safety response by allowing the resulting overcurrent to blow the fuse. The harmful condition of switch failure automatically triggers the fuse to open the circuit, transforming a potential safety hazard into a self-correcting safety mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The safety circuit operates autonomously without requiring complex control logic or active monitoring. The fuse automatically detects and responds to switch failure conditions through its inherent physical properties, providing self-service safety protection without needing additional sensors, microcontrollers, or decision-making circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The simplified safety circuit is more reliable, cost-effective, and effectively prevents overheating in electrical appliances with heating elements by using fewer components and ensuring power is cut off in case of switch failure, enhancing user safety.

Implementation Method 1

A fuse is located between the line 12 and the rest of the safety circuit 10 and heating element or load 14 so that if the fuse 18 is blown, power to the safety circuit and to the heating element 14 is turned off

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10164421B1Safety circuits for electrical products
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 FAN YU HEALTH TECH BUSINESS CO LTD
  • US10164421B1 patent drawing
  • US10164421B1 patent drawing
  • US10164421B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The response of a switch supplying electrical power to a load is periodically tested to ensure proper operation and control over the switch. In the event the switch does not respond to commands from a controller during a test cycle to turn off and open a circuit supplying power to the load, a short circuit is created by a test switch. In this event, a fuse is automatically blown preventing uncontrolled power from reaching the load. In one example, the load can take the form of a resistive heating element in an electric heating blanket or electric heating pad.