Safety Detector Terminal Reconfiguration for Emergency Stop Integration
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional safety detectors with only eight electrical terminals are not suitable for connecting an emergency stop device while maintaining their current functionalities, as they lack the necessary terminals required for this additional safety function.
Innovation Solution
A safety detector with a detection module that includes a test module configured to perform specific test sequences and a control and processing unit to manage the emergency stop functionality, allowing the connection of an emergency stop device using existing terminals by reconfiguring the wiring and adding a test software module.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If conventional safety detectors with eight terminals are used, then the detector maintains its current size and terminal configuration, but it cannot connect an emergency stop device while maintaining existing functionalities
Solution Approach 1:
The patent makes the existing eight terminals multi-functional by dynamically reconfiguring their roles. Terminals can switch between serving safety outputs, control inputs, emergency stop connections, and test functions depending on the operational mode. This allows the detector to connect emergency stop devices without adding physical terminals, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and terminal configuration complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements dynamic terminal reconfiguration where the function of each terminal changes based on the operational state. During normal operation, terminals serve safety functions; during test mode, they switch to test signal transmission. This dynamic behavior enables the system to accommodate emergency stop connections while maintaining existing functionalities, solving the adaptability-complexity contradiction.
2Adaptability or versatility
If additional terminals are added to connect emergency stop device, then the detector can support emergency stop function, but the detector size and terminal count increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent makes the existing eight terminals multi-functional by dynamically reconfiguring their roles. Terminals can switch between serving safety outputs, control inputs, emergency stop connections, and test functions depending on the operational mode. This allows the detector to connect emergency stop devices without adding physical terminals, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and terminal configuration complexity.
3Adaptability or versatility
If a safety logic block is added to manage emergency stop functionality, then the detector can support emergency stop, but the device complexity and size increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent enables the safety detector to perform self-testing and self-diagnosis functions through integrated test modules that use the existing terminals. The detector autonomously configures terminals for test modes, transmits test signals, and validates emergency stop functionality without requiring external safety logic blocks. This self-service capability resolves the contradiction by eliminating the need for additional complexity-adding components.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent merges the emergency stop control functionality, test functions, and safety output management into a single integrated safety detector unit. By combining these functions and using dynamic terminal reconfiguration, the system eliminates the need for separate safety logic blocks, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and device structure complexity.
4Adaptability or versatility
If terminals are reconfigured for emergency stop connection, then the detector can support emergency stop device, but the original safety functionalities may be compromised
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic terminal reconfiguration where the function of each terminal changes based on the operational state. During normal operation, terminals serve safety functions with guaranteed reliability; during test mode, they switch to test signal transmission. This temporal separation ensures that safety functionalities are never compromised, as terminals are only reconfigured when safety operations are not active, resolving the contradiction between flexibility and reliability.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs periodic test sequences where the system alternates between normal safety operation and test modes. During test periods, terminals are reconfigured for testing; during normal operation periods, they return to safety functions. This periodic switching ensures safety reliability is maintained while enabling terminal flexibility for emergency stop connections and testing.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Enables the integration of an emergency stop device with the safety detector, maintaining the detector's original functionalities and size, without the need for additional terminals or a safety logic block, by utilizing the existing eight terminals effectively.
Implementation Method 1
The use of radio frequency technology (RFID) allows communication between the sensor and the transponder
Data Source
Figure 1A
Figure 1B~2A
Figure 2B~3
AI summary
The invention relates to a safety detector (20) comprising a detection module (IN) configured to read a control signal (S_IN) as input, said detector having two power supply terminals, a first control input (I1) and a first control output (C1), a first safety output (OSSD1) and a second safety output (OSSD2), and a first free terminal and a second free terminal, said detector having: - A second control input (I2) connected to the first free terminal and a second control output (C2) connected to the second free terminal, - A test module configured to apply in particular a first test sequence comprising a deactivation of the first control output (C1) and a test of a start loop (B_ST) connected between the second control output (C2) and the first control input (I1).