Auto-Arresting Safety Device Disabling System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Auto-arresting safety devices often fail to ensure operational integrity after activating to arrest a fall, leading to potential dangerous situations when reused without proper inspection, as existing indicators may be ignored or misunderstood, and the device may not be safe for subsequent use.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a disabling system that prevents resetting of the auto-arresting safety device when a threshold load is exceeded, rendering it inoperable to prevent unsafe reuse by physically locking the pawls in a latched position, ensuring the device cannot be reset or reused until inspected and potentially replaced.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the auto-arresting safety device is made resettable to allow reuse after fall arrest, then device complexity and ease of operation are improved, but reliability deteriorates because the device may be reused after experiencing loads that compromise its safety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresetting operationVSAvoidoperational integrity after fall arrest
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The disabling system performs preliminary action by automatically preventing resetting before any potential unsafe reuse can occur. When the fall arrest system experiences a load exceeding the threshold, the disabling system proactively engages to lock the pawl in a disabled position, eliminating the possibility of unsafe resetting before it can happen.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The disabling system provides critical feedback about the operational integrity of the fall arrest system. By monitoring whether experienced loads exceed the threshold, the system automatically communicates the safety status through the engaging/disabling mechanism, informing users whether the device is safe for reuse without requiring manual inspection or judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If fall arrest indicators such as flags or color-coded devices are used to indicate device activation, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates because these indicators may be ignored or misunderstood by unqualified persons

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice status indicationVSAvoidsafety assurance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The disabling system performs self-service by automatically managing its own disabling state based on the load experienced by the fall arrest system. The system autonomously engages or disengages the pawl based on threshold load detection, eliminating the need for human judgment or interpretation of indicator status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The disabling system replaces the inadequate mechanical indicator system (flags, color-coded devices) with a functional mechanical lockout mechanism. Instead of merely displaying status, the disabling system physically prevents operation when unsafe, substituting passive indication with active control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If the safety device is designed to allow manual resetting after fall arrest, then ease of operation is improved, but object-generated harmful factors worsen because the device may fail during subsequent falls if it has experienced excessive loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual resetting capabilityVSAvoiddevice failure risk after excessive load
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The disabling system applies preliminary anti-action by preemptively preventing any resetting action that could lead to unsafe reuse. When the fall arrest system experiences excessive load, the disabling system engages in advance to block the resetting mechanism, countering any potential harmful action before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The disabling system acts as an intermediary between the fall arrest system and the resetting mechanism. It mediates the resetting process by allowing it only when safe (pawl disengaged) and blocking it when unsafe (pawl engaged), preventing direct interaction between the user and a potentially unsafe system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9056753B2Disabling system for auto-arresting safety device
Publication Date: 2015.06.16 LR ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
  • US9056753B2 patent drawing
  • US9056753B2 patent drawing
  • US9056753B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An auto-arresting safety device, comprising a housing; a fall arrest system supported by the housing, and having a first component moveable with respect to a second component, the fall arrest system being actuatable in response to a load to arrest movement of the first component relative to the second component, the fall arrest system being resettable to restore movement of the first component relative to the second component upon the load being at least partially removed; and a disabling system operable to prevent resetting of the fall arrest system upon the load exceeding a threshold load, such that, when actuated, the disabling system renders the safety device inoperable.