Interlinked Safety Logic Interfaces for Complex Cause-Effect Matrices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current process control systems face challenges in managing large and complex cause and effect matrices (CEMs) due to their limited size and inability to handle sophisticated relationships, leading to tedious and error-prone implementation, which is critical for safety systems where inaccuracies can result in serious hazards.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that configures CEMs as separated monitor and effect blocks, allowing for pattern identification, grouping, and interactive functionality, along with tools for reordering and reverse engineering to simplify and validate the logic implementation, and automatically compare actual configurations to design documents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional cause and effect matrix (CEM) is used to manage safety logic, then the system can detect events and trigger safety effects, but the system becomes difficult to manage and error-prone when the CEM grows large and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety logic accuracyVSAvoidCEM management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the traditional monolithic CEM into a hierarchical structure with a global CEM and multiple local CEMs. Each local CEM manages a specific subset of cause-effect relationships, making the overall system more manageable. The global CEM coordinates between local CEMs, enabling complex safety logic to be broken down into smaller, more manageable units that reduce errors and improve reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate cause-effect pairs that act as mediators between local CEMs and the global CEM. These intermediate pairs serve as communication interfaces, allowing local CEMs to trigger effects in other local CEMs through the global CEM coordination layer, thereby managing complexity while maintaining system-wide safety logic integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the CEM is expanded to handle more cause-effect relationships, then the system can cover more safety scenarios, but the implementation becomes more tedious and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety scenario coverageVSAvoidimplementation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the CEM into local units, each handling specific safety scenarios, the system achieves high adaptability and versatility without proportionally increasing implementation difficulty. Each local CEM can be configured and validated independently, making the overall implementation process more manageable despite covering extensive safety scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automated validation mechanisms that provide feedback during configuration. The system validates cause-effect relationships, checks for conflicts, and ensures logical consistency, thereby reducing implementation errors even as the system expands to cover more safety scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If manual configuration of large CEMs is performed, then detailed safety logic can be implemented, but the process is time-consuming and prone to errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety logic configuration accuracyVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates automated validation that provides immediate feedback on configuration errors, logical conflicts, and inconsistencies. This feedback mechanism detects issues during configuration rather than during operation, significantly improving accuracy while reducing the time needed for manual checking and debugging of safety logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-validation of the CEM configuration, automatically checking for errors and conflicts without requiring extensive manual verification. This self-service capability maintains high configuration accuracy while reducing the time investment required from operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11709472B2System and method for providing interlinked user interfaces corresponding to safety logic of a process control system
Publication Date: 2023.07.25 FISHER ROSEMOUNT SYST INC
  • US11709472B2 patent drawing
  • US11709472B2 patent drawing
  • US11709472B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for enabling access to information included in a safety requirement specification (SRS) for a process plant, the process plant controlled by a process control system including displaying, in a user interface, a cause and effect matrix (CEM) having a set of elements including a set of causes and a set of effects, wherein each of the set of causes represents a condition within the process plant and each of the set of effects represents an effect to be performed within the process plant, and wherein at least some of the set of causes and the set of effects are related as cause-effect pairs whereby the corresponding effect activates in response to an occurrence of the corresponding condition. The system and method further including receiving, via the user interface, a selection of an element of the set of elements, and, in response to receiving the selection: (i) accessing, from the SRS, a set of information associated with the element of the set of elements, and (ii) displaying the set of information in the user interface.