Safety Sensor Reference Contour for Automated Protective Field Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional monitoring devices for hazardous areas require manual reconfiguration of protective fields, which is cumbersome and time-consuming, especially when multiple fields need adjustment.

Innovation Solution

A monitoring device with a safety sensor that determines a reference contour during a teach-in process, using measured values to automatically check and correct protective fields, eliminating the need for manual verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual verification of protective fields is performed, then configuration accuracy is improved, but time consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-verification by automatically comparing measured values against the reference contour during operation. The control device autonomously determines whether objects are within protective fields without requiring manual operator verification, thus eliminating time-consuming manual checks while maintaining configuration accuracy through automated plausibility checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously feeds back measured values from the safety sensor to the control device, which automatically compares these measurements with the stored reference contour. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables real-time verification of protective field configurations without manual intervention, resolving the contradiction between accuracy and time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Area of stationary object

If multiple protective fields are configured, then monitoring coverage is improved, but operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring coverageVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control device is designed with multi-functionality to automatically manage multiple protective fields simultaneously. It can store multiple reference contours, process measurements from multiple zones, and independently evaluate each protective field configuration, thereby providing comprehensive monitoring coverage without increasing operational complexity for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically performs plausibility checks for all configured protective fields without requiring operator intervention. The control device autonomously manages the complexity of multiple field configurations by continuously comparing measured values against all stored reference contours and triggering appropriate safety functions, making multi-field monitoring as easy as single-field monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automated reference contour checking is implemented, then operational efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reference contour is determined in advance during a teach-in process before normal operation begins. By pre-configuring the reference data during installation, the system eliminates the need for complex real-time calculations during operation, thereby improving operational efficiency while containing system complexity to the initial setup phase rather than ongoing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Automated protective field adjustment ensures accurate and efficient monitoring without operator intervention, enhancing safety and reducing time and labor in configuring protective fields.

Implementation Method 1

an optical sensor, which is designed, for example, as a scanning sensor in such a way that a monitored area is periodically scanned using the light beams of a transmitting/receiving unit of this optical sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight: Light

Implementation Method 2

which can advantageously be used to perform distance measurements using a pulse-time-of-flight method or a phase measurement method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentEP4592581A1Monitoring device
Publication Date: 2025.07.30 LEUZE ELECTRONIC GMBH & CO KG
  • EP4592581A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4592581A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4592581A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a monitoring device (1) with a safety sensor (4) designed for protective field monitoring. The safety sensor (4) determines the positions of objects in a monitoring area (5). In a teach-in process, a reference contour (21) is determined in the safety sensor (4) based on the positions of non-safety-critical objects detected by the safety sensor (4). This reference contour is continuously checked for plausibility using measured values detected by the safety sensor (4). The reference contour (21) is used to monitor configured protective fields (6).