Hand-Operated Safety Switch With Electronic Time Delay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hand-operated safety switches with time delay have low safety and reliability due to lack of prevention against unauthorized operations and interference from dust or dirt, and mechanical time lag mechanisms are prone to failures.

Innovation Solution

A hand-operated safety switch with electronic or electromechanical components, featuring a locking mechanism with a predetermined time delay, proximity sensing, and a centering pin system to ensure precise alignment and prevent unauthorized access, while protecting electronic components from mechanical interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mechanical time delay means are used, then time delay function is achieved, but reliability deteriorates due to high fail degree of mechanical components

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical time delay means with electronic time delay means. The electronic control unit processes signals electronically to achieve the time delay function, eliminating mechanical moving parts that are prone to failure. This substitution significantly improves reliability while maintaining the time delay functionality required for safe operation sequencing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an electronic control unit as an intermediary between the operating element and the locking mechanism. This electronic intermediary processes the operating signal, implements the time delay logic, and controls the unlocking sequence, replacing direct mechanical linkages and improving overall system reliability through electronic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If slot is provided for actuator insertion, then ease of operation is improved, but safety deteriorates due to unauthorized access and dust/dirt contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical slot-based actuator interface with an electronic or electromagnetic interface. The operating element communicates with the electronic control unit through non-mechanical means (such as electromagnetic coupling or electronic signals), eliminating the physical slot that allows dust ingress and unauthorized mechanical manipulation, while maintaining ease of operation through contactless or sealed interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs sealed enclosures and protective barriers (such as sealed housings or electromagnetic shielding) that prevent dust and dirt from entering the internal components while allowing the operating element to function. This sealing approach maintains safety by preventing contamination without compromising the ease of operation, as the sealed interface still allows for user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Ease of manufacture

If external wire connections are used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to vulnerability to interference and damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the signal transmission function and power supply function into integrated printed circuit board traces and internal conductors. Instead of using separate external wires for signal and power connections, the electronic control unit and switching means are interconnected through integrated circuit pathways, reducing vulnerability to external interference and physical damage while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces external wire connections with internal printed circuit board traces and embedded conductors. The electrical connections between components are formed through PCB routing and soldering rather than external wire harnesses, eliminating the vulnerability of exposed wires to interference, damage, and disconnection while maintaining ease of manufacture through standard PCB fabrication processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If mechanical locking mechanism is used, then ease of operation is improved, but safety deteriorates due to possibility of negligent or fraudulent operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the purely mechanical locking mechanism with an electronically controlled locking system. The electronic control unit processes operating signals, implements safety logic, and controls the unlocking sequence electronically. This electronic control prevents negligent or fraudulent operation by requiring proper sequencing and validation, while maintaining ease of operation through user-friendly electronic interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the electronic control unit monitors the state of the locking mechanism and operating elements. The system provides feedback signals to validate proper operation sequencing, ensure safety conditions are met before unlocking, and prevent unauthorized or negligent operation. This feedback loop enhances safety while maintaining ease of operation through automated validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a high degree of safety and reliability by ensuring the plant starts only in a safe condition, preventing unauthorized openings, and maintaining operational integrity even in dusty environments by eliminating mechanical components and external connections.

Implementation Method 1

WO 2013/087183 discloses in turn a safety switch with mechanical key operation, but provided with a proximity sensor adapted to communicate with the actuator key, having in turn an inductive solenoid, to detect its presence.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9819342B2Hand-operated safety switch with time delay
Publication Date: 2017.11.14 PIZZATO ELETTRICA SRL
  • US9819342B2 patent drawing
  • US9819342B2 patent drawing
  • US9819342B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An hand-operated safety switch with time delay (1) comprises a switching device (2) adapted to be anchored to a fixed part of the protection and provided with switching means (5) adapted to be connected to a plant to be controlled, an operating device (3) adapted to be anchored to a movable part of the protection for interacting with the switching means (5) upon the closing of the movable part. The switching device (2) comprises a locking mechanism (9) associated with the switching means (5) and adapted to selectively hold/release the operating device (3) and hand-operable unlocking means (10) operatively coupled with the locking mechanism (9) for unlocking the operating device (3) with a predetermined time delay with respect of the switching of the power supply circuit by the switching means (5). The switching device (2) has sensor means (13) operatively coupled with the switching means (5) for modifying their operative condition in function of an inlet signal. The operating device (3) also comprises a transmitter (14) adapted to send a proximity signal to be received as input by the sensor means (13) for controlling the switching means (5) when said transmitter (14) is place at a predetermined minimum distance from the sensor means (13). The locking mechanism (9) also comprises an inner passage (29) adapted to allow the passage of means for connecting the sensor means (13) with the switching means (5) avoiding the interference with the unlocking means (10).