Safety Switch Device With Evaluation Circuit For Panic Mode Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mobile hand-operated devices for issuing potentially dangerous control commands lack robust safety features, particularly in detecting the functioning of the panic operating mode, leading to potential safety risks due to unintentional enablement and undetected faults, and often require complex designs to ensure safety.

Innovation Solution

A safety switch device with an evaluation circuit and enable buttons that require distinct operating forces and displacement distances to switch between idle, enable, and panic modes, ensuring that the panic mode is reliably detected before enabling signals can be output, and incorporating redundant detection circuits to prevent single faults from causing safety failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mechanical solutions for enable buttons with dual-circuit and three-stage design are used to ensure safety, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases and construction size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the purely mechanical switching operation with an electronic evaluation circuit that processes signals from a simplified switch mechanism. The evaluation circuit implements the dual-circuit logic and three-stage state management electronically, eliminating the need for complex mechanical linkages and moving parts while maintaining safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent separates the switching function from the evaluation function. The switch mechanism is simplified to only detect button states, while the electronic evaluation circuit handles the complex logic of determining enablement states, panic states, and safety validation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If purely mechanical switching operation is used for enable buttons, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical switching mechanisms with a simplified switch coupled to an electronic evaluation circuit. The electronic circuit performs the safety-critical evaluation functions that would otherwise require intricate mechanical designs, thereby reducing manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining or improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the state detection from purely mechanical position detection to electrical signal detection. By using electrical contacts and electronic evaluation, the system achieves the same safety functions with simpler mechanical components and lower manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If enable buttons are ergonomically integrated in the hand-operated device for effortless operation, then ease of operation is improved, but safety risk increases due to potential unintentional enablement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational convenienceVSAvoidunintentional enablement risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements different operating characteristics for different regions or states of the enable button. The button has distinct force thresholds and displacement requirements for transitioning between idle, enable, and panic states. This local differentiation of mechanical properties allows ergonomic operation while preventing unintentional activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation circuit continuously monitors the state of the enable button and provides feedback control. The system only permits machine operation when the enable button is intentionally activated, and immediately halts operation when released or switched to panic mode. This feedback mechanism ensures that ergonomic buttons cannot cause unintentional enablement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If detection of panic operating mode is not implemented, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to undetected faults

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection system complexityVSAvoidsafety functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation circuit proactively detects and validates the panic operating mode capability before permitting enablement. The system checks that the panic function is operational and ready to interrupt machine operation if needed. This preliminary detection ensures safety functionality is verified in advance rather than relying on post-factum detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation circuit continuously monitors the panic button state and provides feedback to the control system. When the panic button is pressed, the circuit immediately detects this state and triggers interruption of machine operation. This continuous feedback ensures that panic functionality remains reliable and responsive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9079317B2Method of operating a mobile hand-operated device for outputting or enabling potentially dangerous control commands and corresponding hand-operated device
Publication Date: 2015.07.14 KEBA IND AUTOMATION GMBH
  • US9079317B2 patent drawing
  • US9079317B2 patent drawing
  • US9079317B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method of operating a mobile hand-operated device (9) provided as a means of outputting or enabling potentially dangerous control commands to a controllable technical device (1) actively connected to it or to another hand-operated device(9′). A safety switch device (16) . . . comprising at least one evaluation circuit and at least one enable button (18) connected to the evaluation circuit for transmitting signals is provided, which has an idle mode which is assumed automatically without applying operating force and two consecutive operating modes set on the basis of a differing strength of operating force and/or by different displacement distances in the form of an enable operation mode and a panic operating mode. Either an active mode is assigned to the at least one enable button (18) in which an enabling mode for running potentially dangerous control commands can be signalled or made available when the enable operation mode is assumed, or an inactive mode in which signalling or availability of the enabling mode is suppressed or not possible. When or after the evaluation circuit has detected on the basis of signals that the panic operating mode or the panic operating mode and the idle mode has been assumed, the active mode is assigned to the respective enable button (18). Also specified is a corresponding mobile hand-operated device (9, 9′) and a corresponding safety switching device (16).