Safety Switch Zoning for Slack-Tolerant Guard Position Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety switch systems often incorrectly detect a safety-critical condition when a protection device, such as a door, becomes slack relative to the machine frame, leading to unnecessary machine shutdowns and reduced productivity.

Innovation Solution

A safety switch system that divides the safety zone into multiple subzones, allowing for the recognition of three conditions: detection within a first subzone, detection within a second subzone, and undetection within both subzones, enabling a transition area to differentiate between safety-critical and non-safety-critical conditions, and signaling these conditions via wireless communication for appropriate reactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a protection device is monitored using a binary safety switch system, then safety-critical conditions can be detected, but false detection of safety-critical conditions occurs when the device becomes slack, leading to unnecessary machine shutdowns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of safety-critical condition detectionVSAvoidmachine downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety zone is divided into multiple subzones (first subzone, second subzone, third subzone) instead of using a single binary detection zone. This segmentation allows the system to distinguish between different positional states of the protection device, enabling differentiation between actual safety-critical conditions and mere slackening, thereby reducing false shutdowns while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the safety zone is divided into multiple subzones, then false detection is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of condition recognitionVSAvoidcomplexity of safety switch system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection zone is segmented into multiple subzones with distinct evaluation criteria. The control unit is programmed to recognize different conditions (first condition, second condition, third condition) based on which subzone the protection device occupies, allowing complex behavior through simple spatial segmentation rather than complex hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of zone division from a single binary state to multiple discrete states (subzones). By modifying the detection parameter from yes/no to multiple positional categories, the system achieves more nuanced safety evaluation without fundamentally changing the hardware architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If a protection device is allowed to move freely, then ease of operation is improved, but the position accuracy deteriorates due to sagging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement freedom of protection deviceVSAvoidposition detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the detection zone into multiple subzones, the system can tolerate position variations (sagging) within the second subzone without triggering false safety-critical alarms. This segmentation provides a buffer zone that accommodates normal movement freedom while maintaining measurement precision for actual safety-critical positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second subzone acts as a cushion zone that absorbs position variations and sagging before they can cause false safety-critical detections. This pre-established buffer prevents the deterioration of measurement precision by providing a transition area between normal operation and safety-critical states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS10928003B2Method for signaling the position of a safety device, and safety switching system
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 PHOENIX CONTACT GMBH & CO KG
  • US10928003B2 patent drawing
  • US10928003B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for signaling the position of a safety device with respect to a safety zone to be monitored with regard to the safety device, as well as a safety switch system suitable for carrying out the method. For monitoring the safety zone, the position of the safety device with respect to the safety zone is detected with a detection device, and the safety zone is divided into a first subzone and at least a second subzone. If the position of the safety device is detected within the first subzone, this is recognized as the first condition; if the position of the safety device is detected in the area of the second subzone, this is recognized as a second condition; and if the position of the safety device is not detected within the first subzone or in the area of the second subzone, this is recognized as a third condition. Furthermore, recognition of the third condition is signaled by a safety-oriented release signal for releasing of a predetermined safety-oriented reaction and/or recognition of the first and/or second condition(s) is signaled by an information signal with data pertaining to the respective condition to a display device, in particular a display device in a wireless connection.