Vehicular Safety System Driver Awareness Hazard Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicular safety systems often overwhelm drivers with excessive alerts, leading to distraction and potential system disablement, as they attempt to alert operators to all possible hazards within their environment.

Innovation Solution

A vehicular safety system combining inward-facing sensors to monitor the driver's awareness and outward-facing sensors to detect hazards, using an attention-evaluation module to selectively provide alerts only for unperceived hazards, thereby reducing unnecessary warnings and enhancing the system's usefulness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system alerts the driver to all possible hazards, then hazard detection completeness is improved, but driver distraction and alert overload increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection completenessVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses driver monitor data (gaze tracking, attention evaluation) as feedback to dynamically control which hazard alerts are generated. The attention evaluation module continuously monitors driver awareness state and uses this feedback to suppress alerts for hazards that the driver has already perceived, thereby reducing unnecessary distractions while maintaining comprehensive hazard detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of driver awareness using gaze tracking and attention metrics before generating hazard alerts. By pre-assessing whether the driver is likely to have noticed a hazard based on their visual attention patterns, the system可以避免 generating redundant alerts that would distract the driver

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system provides many hazard alerts, then hazard awareness is improved, but system usefulness decreases due to alert overload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard awarenessVSAvoidsystem usefulness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively generating alerts only for hazards that meet specific criteria (driver unperceived hazards based on attention evaluation). Rather than alerting to all detected hazards, the system applies alert generation partially - only when necessary - thereby maintaining hazard awareness while avoiding alert overload that would reduce system usefulness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the system reduces the number of alerts, then driver distraction is reduced, but hazard detection coverage decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver distractionVSAvoidhazard detection coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses real-time feedback from driver monitoring systems (gaze tracking, head position, attention evaluation) to intelligently determine which hazards require alerts. This feedback mechanism ensures that alert reduction does not compromise hazard detection coverage, as the system maintains comprehensive hazard sensing but selectively alerts only when the driver is unlikely to have noticed the hazard

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If the system monitors driver awareness continuously, then alert relevance is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert relevanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by using the driver monitor for multiple purposes: gaze tracking for awareness evaluation, head position monitoring for attention assessment, and potential use for other driver state monitoring functions. This universal approach to driver monitoring improves alert relevance without proportionally increasing system complexity, as a single monitoring infrastructure serves multiple evaluation functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2523839B1Combining driver and environment sensing for vehicular safety systems
Publication Date: 2019.05.08 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • EP2523839B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2523839B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2523839B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An apparatus for assisting safe operation of a vehicle includes an environment sensor system detecting hazards within the vehicle environment, a driver monitor providing driver awareness data (such as a gaze track), and an attention-evaluation module identifying hazards as sufficiently or insufficiently sensed by the driver by comparing the hazard data and the gaze track. An alert signal relating to the unperceived hazards can be provided.