Sailboat Winch Self-Tailing Reverse Winding Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing winches for sailboats face challenges in reliable and easy operation during reverse winding, with complex mechanisms and non-intuitive control systems posing safety and operational hazards.

Innovation Solution

A self-tailing winch design with a rope guide channel and retainer guide that allows for consistent grip and easy rope insertion during reverse winding, combined with a mechanical driving arrangement featuring a third unidirectional drive means for multi-speed manual and motorized forward and reverse winding capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a self-tailing arrangement with rope lock rings is used to grip rope during reverse winding, then rope grip reliability is improved, but the complexity of the device increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverope grip reliabilityVSAvoidself-tailing arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The self-tailing arrangement is divided into separate functional components: upper and lower rope lock rings for gripping, a feeder arm for guiding rope, and a retainer guide with retainer lip for controlling rope entry during reverse winding. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, improving reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retainer guide acts as an intermediary component between the rope and the rope lock rings during reverse winding operations. It controls the rope's entry into the self-tailing arrangement, ensuring proper positioning and preventing rope escape, thereby enhancing grip reliability without requiring the rope lock rings themselves to be more complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Force

If multiple reduction gear ratios are provided for hand-cranking operation, then mechanical advantage is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical advantageVSAvoidgearing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gear selection mechanism is designed to be dynamically changeable during operation. The user can switch between different reduction gear ratios by changing the direction of manual cranking (clockwise or anticlockwise), allowing the system to adapt to different loading conditions and provide optimal mechanical advantage without requiring a complex fixed multi-speed gearbox.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The manual drive spindle and gear system are designed to serve multiple functions: providing different reduction ratios for forward winding, enabling reverse winding operation, and allowing hand-cranking or motorized operation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate mechanisms for each function, thereby reducing overall device complexity while maintaining high mechanical advantage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If powered reverse winding capability is added to the winch, then operational versatility is improved, but the device complexity and control system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereverse winding capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The winch system is designed to automatically handle rope management during reverse winding operations. The self-tailing arrangement with the retainer guide automatically guides and secures the rope as it is paid out, eliminating the need for manual rope handling and complex control mechanisms to manage rope tension and positioning during reverse winding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of adding complex control systems to manage reverse winding, the design inverts the approach by using the existing forward winding mechanism and self-tailing arrangement to automatically handle reverse winding operations. The motor can rotate the drum in reverse, and the self-tailing arrangement automatically manages the rope, simplifying the control system while providing versatile operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Ease of operation

If manual rope payment during reverse winding is performed, then operational simplicity is maintained, but safety hazards and operational risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidsafety hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The self-tailing arrangement with the retainer guide automatically manages the rope during reverse winding operations. The retainer guide controls rope entry into the self-tailing arrangement, and the rope lock rings automatically grip the rope as it is paid out, eliminating the need for manual rope handling and reducing safety hazards associated with manual operation under high load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The retainer guide acts as a safety intermediary between the motorized reverse winding operation and the rope. It controls the rope's entry into the self-tailing arrangement, preventing rope escape and uncontrolled payment, thereby reducing safety hazards while maintaining operational simplicity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the reliability and safety of reverse winding operations by ensuring consistent rope grip and controlled reverse winding, while simplifying the control system to reduce operator complexity and improve handling in challenging conditions.

Implementation Method 1

the retainer guide is spring mounted to allow movement of the retainer guide in a direction substantially parallel to the rotational axis of the winch drum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring mounting: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The rope lock rings are typically spring biased towards each other to allow a range of rope diameters to fit into the channel defined between the rope lock rings and be gripped by the rope lock rings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring bias: Spring

Implementation Method 3

The three or four turns of rope on the drum typically provide a great deal of frictional hold on the rope

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS9061870B2Winch
Publication Date: 2015.06.23 LEWMAR LTD
  • US9061870B2 patent drawing
  • US9061870B2 patent drawing
  • US9061870B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A winch for a sailboat comprises a support for mounting the winch with respect to a sailboat, a winch drum rotatable with respect to the support, a ring gear fixed with respect to the winch drum, a main drive gear meshing with the ring gear for driving rotation of the winch drum, a manual drive spindle 300 and a motor gear shaft 114. Forward winding of the winch drum in a first gearing ratio and in a second gearing ratio which are selected depending on the direction of rotation of the manual drive spindle. Gear trains provide the first and second gearing ratios. Manual and motorized operational arrangements are possible.