Salience-Aware Cross-Attention for Adaptive Abstractive Summarization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing abstractive summarization models rely on imperfect extractive summaries as guidance, leading to information loss, noise, and positional or length biases, especially when dealing with documents of varying abstractiveness.

Innovation Solution

The proposed method, SEASON, uses salience allocation expectation to guide abstractive summarization, incorporating a salience-aware cross-attention (SACA) decoder that adapts to different documents by mapping salience degrees to trainable embeddings and determining the appropriate signal to accept from the salience guidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If extractive summaries are used as guidance for abstractive summarization, then the model gains higher-level understanding of input documents, but information loss and noise occur when there are too many or too few summary-worthy sentences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance reliabilityVSAvoidinformation loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic salience allocation that adapts to each document's characteristics. The model learns to allocate different numbers of salient sentences based on document properties rather than using a fixed extractive summary length. This dynamic approach allows the guidance to remain reliable whether the document has many or few summary-worthy sentences, preventing both information loss and noise issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of salience allocation from fixed (extractive summary length) to variable. By learning to allocate salient sentences dynamically based on document characteristics, the system adjusts the number and selection of guidance sentences to match each document's abstractiveness, thereby maintaining guidance reliability without causing information loss or noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If extractive summaries are used as guidance, then abstractive summarization performance improves in some cases, but the approach is not flexible to adapt to documents with different abstractiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummarization performanceVSAvoidadaptability to different abstractiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic salience allocation that automatically adapts to documents with varying abstractiveness. The model learns to allocate salient sentences based on document characteristics, making the guidance flexible rather than fixed. This enables the system to maintain high summarization performance across documents with different levels of abstractiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal salience allocation mechanism that works across documents with different abstractiveness levels. The learned allocation strategy serves multiple functions: it adapts to varying document properties, maintains performance consistency, and provides flexible guidance regardless of whether documents are highly abstract or concrete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If extractive summaries are used as guidance, then the model receives structured input, but positional biases and length biases are introduced due to imperfect selection processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructured input provisionVSAvoidguidance fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a learned salience allocation process that uses feedback to identify and correct biases. The model learns from training data to allocate salient sentences in a way that minimizes positional and length biases. This feedback mechanism ensures that the structured input provided to the model remains fair and reliable, preventing systematic errors from propagating through the summarization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12347218B2Salience-aware cross-attention for abstractive summarization
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 TENCENT AMERICA LLC
  • US12347218B2 patent drawing
  • US12347218B2 patent drawing
  • US12347218B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method including: receiving an input comprising natural language texts at an encoder; adding a token to the input; obtaining a last-layer hidden state as a natural language text representation; feeding the natural language text representation into a single-layer classification head; predicting a salience allocation based on the single-layer classification head; developing a salience-aware cross-attention (SACA) decoder to determine salience in the natural language text representation; mapping a plurality of salience degrees to a plurality of trainable salience embeddings; estimating an amount of signal to accept from the plurality of trainable salience embeddings; incorporating the salience allocation and the signal in a cross-attention layer model; and generating a summarization based on the SACA decoder and the cross-attention layer model.