Salvaging Hardware Transactions via About-to-Fail Handlers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-core processor systems, partially executed hardware transactions often fail due to conflicts or resource limitations, leading to inefficiencies and wasted cycles as they are typically aborted, discarding valuable speculative state and requiring fallback paths, which complicates software development and increases overhead.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced where the processor determines information about an about-to-fail handler for transactional execution, allowing it to salvage partially executed hardware transactions by executing an about-to-fail handler that determines whether the transaction can be salvaged or aborted, thereby preserving and utilizing speculative state that would otherwise be discarded.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hardware transactions are aborted when conflicts or resource limitations occur, then transaction isolation and correctness are maintained, but speculative state is discarded and performance efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction isolationVSAvoidperformance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the discarding and recovering principle by capturing speculative state information (register values, memory addresses, instruction pointers) before transaction abort, then recovering and reusing this state in a salvage handler to avoid complete transaction abandonment. This allows partial transaction work to be preserved and continued, improving performance while maintaining isolation through controlled state recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-capturing and storing speculative state information (transaction context, register states, memory access patterns) before the transaction fails. This preliminary capture enables the salvage handler to quickly restore and continue execution without重新启动 the entire transaction, thus maintaining reliability while improving productivity through reduced restart overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If fallback paths are implemented to handle transaction failures, then system reliability is maintained, but software complexity and development burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsoftware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the transaction system to automatically manage its own state recovery and continuation through the salvage handler mechanism. The system captures its own speculative state, manages the recovery process, and continues execution without requiring external intervention or complex fallback logic, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing software complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The salvage handler serves multiple functions: it recovers speculative state, determines whether to salvage or abort, and manages transaction continuation. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate fallback paths and error handling logic into a single universal handler, reducing software complexity while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If speculative state is preserved and reused, then performance efficiency is improved, but transaction management complexity and resource overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance efficiencyVSAvoidtransaction management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential speculative state information (register values, memory addresses, instruction pointers) needed for transaction continuation, rather than preserving the entire transaction context. This selective extraction reduces the overhead of state management while maintaining performance efficiency by capturing only the critical elements required for salvage operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If about-to-fail handlers are executed to salvage transactions, then resource utilization is improved, but execution time and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidexecution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-capturing speculative state information before transaction failure, so that when the about-to-fail handler is executed, the recovery and continuation process can proceed quickly using pre-prepared state data. This reduces the execution time overhead of the salvage process while improving resource utilization through transaction continuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9971628B2Salvaging hardware transactions
Publication Date: 2018.05.15 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9971628B2 patent drawing
  • US9971628B2 patent drawing
  • US9971628B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transactional memory system salvages a partially executed hardware transaction. A processor of the transactional memory system determines information about an about-to-fail handler for transactional execution of a code region of a hardware transaction. The processor then executes the about-to-fail handler using the information about the about-to-fail handler, the about-to-fail handler determining whether the hardware transaction is to be salvaged or to be aborted.