Sample Positioning Stage Dual-Mode Drive System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sample positioning stages for optical inspection devices require complex clutch mechanisms to switch between motor-driven and manual operation modes, which increases complexity and cost, and may lead to damage during manual handling or collisions.

Innovation Solution

A sample positioning stage with a drive system that operates in two modes: a high-resistance mode for motor-driven movement and a low-resistance mode for manual movement, allowing seamless transition without disengaging the motor, reducing the need for a clutch mechanism and enhancing user safety and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a clutch mechanism is used to disengage the drive system for manual operation, then manual positioning becomes possible, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual positioning capabilityVSAvoidclutch mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the clutch mechanism entirely from the system. Instead of adding a disengagement mechanism, the drive system is designed to operate continuously in both automated and manual modes without requiring physical separation or clutch engagement/disengagement components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The drive system dynamically adjusts its operational mode between automated motor control and manual manipulation. The controller switches between receiving commands from the automated control system and allowing direct user input, enabling flexible operation without mechanical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the drive system provides high resistance for precise motor control, then positioning precision improves, but manual handling becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precisionVSAvoidmanual handling ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The drive system's resistance characteristics are dynamically adjusted based on operational mode. During automated operation, the motor provides controlled resistance for precise positioning. During manual operation, the controller allows the motor to free-wheel or provide minimal resistance, enabling easy manual manipulation while maintaining positioning precision through the feedback system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller changes the electrical parameters of the motor depending on operational mode. In automated mode, full motor torque and resistance are applied for precise control. In manual mode, the controller reduces motor resistance and torque output, allowing the user to move the stage easily while the feedback system continues to track position accurately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If the drive system remains engaged during manual operation, then clutch complexity is reduced, but damage risk during collisions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclutch mechanism eliminationVSAvoidcollision damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback system continuously monitors the position and movement characteristics of the stage. During manual operation, it detects abnormal resistance patterns or movement restrictions that indicate a collision, and immediately signals the controller to disengage the motor or reduce torque, preventing damage while maintaining system engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares for potential collisions by maintaining a monitoring mechanism that detects abnormal conditions before significant damage occurs. The feedback system is continuously active, ready to trigger protective disengagement at the first sign of collision, cushioning against damage before it fully develops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Productivity

If manual dragging is enabled without motor resistance, then positioning speed improves, but control precision during transition becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning speedVSAvoidtransition control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback system operates continuously without interruption during mode transitions. Whether the motor is providing active control or free-wheeling for manual movement, the position feedback remains active, ensuring continuous knowledge of stage location and enabling seamless transition between automated and manual modes without loss of positioning information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS8254022B2Sample positioning stage and method of operation
Publication Date: 2012.08.28 RENISHAW PLC
  • US8254022B2 patent drawing
  • US8254022B2 patent drawing
  • US8254022B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sample positioning stage for positioning a sample to be inspected relative to an optical inspection device. The stage includes a first generally planar body on which a sample to be inspected can be carried and a second body directly coupled to the first body via bearings extending between them which constrain movement of the first body relative to the second body to a first plane that is substantially parallel to the plane of the first body. There is also provided a drive system being selectively operable in a first mode and a second mode.