Sample Processing Apparatus Interrupt Control for Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sample processing apparatuses face long suspension times when abnormalities occur, as they cannot resume processes for samples that were temporarily stopped until all optical measurement operations are finished for other samples, leading to inefficiencies and resource wastage.

Innovation Solution

A sample processing apparatus and method that includes a controller to interrupt and retry operations for samples that have not reached the faulty unit, allowing for resumed processing when the operation is successful, while continuing processes for samples that have already passed the unit, thereby minimizing downtime and resource wastage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the automatic analyzer stops all parts except optical measurement operations when an abnormality occurs, then the reliability of measurement operations is maintained, but the productivity of sample processing deteriorates due to long suspension time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of measurement operationsVSAvoidproductivity of sample processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automatic analyzer is divided into multiple independent functional units (sample introduction unit, reagent addition unit, mixing unit, optical measurement unit, etc.). When an abnormality occurs in one unit, only that specific unit is stopped while other units continue to process samples that have already passed the faulty unit, thereby maintaining overall productivity while ensuring measurement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the operation state of different units based on the location and nature of the abnormality. Samples that have already passed the faulty unit are allowed to continue through the remaining process steps, while samples upstream of the abnormality are stopped. This dynamic control minimizes suspension time and maintains productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If all parts are stopped until optical measurement operations are finished for all samples, then the reliability of the system is maintained, but the loss of time increases due to extended suspension period

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsuspension time of sample processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system identifies and stops processing for samples upstream of the abnormality before they reach the faulty unit, while allowing samples that have already passed the faulty unit to complete their processing. This preliminary differentiation of sample states reduces the overall suspension time while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous processing for samples that can still be processed (those downstream of the abnormality) while interrupting only the necessary samples upstream of the fault. This continuity principle ensures that useful actions are not unnecessarily interrupted, minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If the process is interrupted for all samples when an abnormality occurs, then the manufacturing precision of sample processing is maintained, but the productivity deteriorates due to complete stoppage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of sample processingVSAvoidproductivity of sample processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different quality control measures to different samples based on their position relative to the abnormality. Samples upstream of the faulty unit are stopped to maintain processing precision, while samples downstream are allowed to continue, applying local quality control rather than universal stoppage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The sample processing stream is segmented into two groups: samples upstream of the abnormality (stopped) and samples downstream of the abnormality (continued). This segmentation allows precision maintenance for affected samples while preserving productivity through continued processing of unaffected samples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9329193B2Sample processing apparatus and sample processing method
Publication Date: 2016.05.03 SYSMEX CORP
  • US9329193B2 patent drawing
  • US9329193B2 patent drawing
  • US9329193B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sample processing apparatus for performing a process including a plurality of steps on a sample, the sample processing apparatus sequentially processing a plurality of samples, is disclosed. The apparatus comprises a plurality of units corresponding to the respective steps in the process; a transfer section which transfers a sample to the units according to a flow of the steps; and a controller. Specifically, when an operation was not performed successfully, the controller interrupts the process for a sample that had not reached the location where the unsuccessful operation was performed while continuing the process for a sample that had already passed the location, retries the operation that was not performed successfully, and resumes the interrupted process when the retried operation has been performed successfully.