Sample Processing System Rack Conveyance Buffering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sample-processing systems face congestion and inefficiencies due to the integration of rack conveyance functions with analytical units, leading to unnecessary waiting times and increased processing times, especially when multiple analytical units with different processing rates are involved and when retesting is required.

Innovation Solution

A sample-processing system is optimized by assigning only rack conveyance functions to dedicated units, incorporating a buffer unit for random accessibility and processing, which eliminates functional dependence between processing units and conveyance units, allowing for minimized conveying distances and dynamic routing based on processing loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If rack conveyance function is integrated with analytical units, then functional dependence is created, but processing time increases and congestion occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidwaiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the analytical unit into separate functional modules: analytical modules that perform analysis and a dedicated rack conveyance unit that handles rack movement. This segmentation eliminates functional dependence, allowing analytical units to process samples while the conveyance unit independently manages rack transportation, thereby reducing waiting time and congestion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A dedicated rack conveyance unit acts as an intermediary between the rack supply unit and analytical modules. This intermediary handles all rack transportation tasks, freeing analytical units to focus solely on sample analysis. The conveyance unit dynamically routes racks based on processing loads, optimizing overall system productivity without creating bottlenecks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If rack conveyance route is determined upfront, then routing is fixed, but system adaptability to processing loads decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rack conveyance unit employs dynamic routing where the conveyance route is determined in real-time based on the current processing loads of analytical modules. The control unit continuously monitors module status and adjusts rack routing accordingly, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions without requiring complex predetermined routing logic for all scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control where the control unit receives information about analytical module processing loads and uses this feedback to determine optimal rack conveyance routes. This feedback mechanism enables adaptive routing that responds to actual system conditions, balancing flexibility with manageable control complexity through standardized feedback processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If multiple analytical units with different processing rates are used, then processing capacity increases, but congestion and waiting time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidcongestion time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The dedicated rack conveyance unit serves as an intermediary that balances loads between analytical units with different processing rates. By dynamically routing racks to units based on their current workload and processing capabilities, the conveyance unit prevents congestion at faster units and ensures efficient utilization of slower units, thereby maintaining high processing capacity while minimizing waiting time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the routing parameter dynamically based on the processing rates and current loads of analytical units. Instead of fixed routing, the control unit adjusts which analytical unit receives which rack according to real-time parameters such as processing speed, current queue length, and sample priority, optimizing the balance between processing capacity and congestion prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11391750B2Automatic analyzer and sample-processing system
Publication Date: 2022.07.19 HITACHI HIGH TECH CORP
  • US11391750B2 patent drawing
  • US11391750B2 patent drawing
  • US11391750B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sample-processing system that improves total system processing efficiency, and reduces a sample-processing time, by establishing a functionally independent relationship between a rack conveyance block with rack supply, conveyance, and recovery functions, and a processing block with sample preprocessing, analysis, and other functions. A buffer unit with random accessibility to multiple racks standing by for processing is combined with each of multiple processing units to form a pair, and the system is constructed to load and unload racks into and from the buffer unit through the rack conveyance block so that one unprocessed rack is loaded into the buffer unit and then upon completion of process steps up to automatic retesting, unloaded from the buffer unit. Functional dependence between any processing unit and a conveyance unit is thus eliminated.