Automated Sample Processing Reagent Validation via Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated sample processing systems face challenges in validating new reagents and troubleshooting reagent performance, particularly when switching between reagent containers, due to difficulties in determining the exact switching point and inherent variations in tissue samples.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a virtual split run mode in automated sample processing systems, which divides sample carriers and reagent containers into groups to perform validation and troubleshooting tasks, allowing for separate processing protocols and comparison of results to ensure reagent validity and identify potential issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated sample processing systems process samples using multiple reagent containers sequentially, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to difficulty in determining the exact switching point and inherent variations in tissue samples

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidreagent validation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the sample carriers into different groups (e.g., first group, second group) and assigns different reagent containers to each group. This segmentation allows simultaneous processing of validation samples and routine samples using separate reagent containers, enabling clear determination of reagent switching points while maintaining high throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation processing by processing a first group of sample carriers with a first reagent container before processing the second group with a second reagent container. This preliminary action establishes baseline performance data and validates reagent performance before routine processing, ensuring reliability without interrupting overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system processes all samples with a single reagent container, then reliability is maintained, but productivity decreases due to inability to efficiently validate new reagents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereagent performance consistencyVSAvoidreagent validation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides sample carriers into multiple groups that can be processed with different reagent containers. This allows the system to maintain reliable processing with known reagents while simultaneously validating new reagents on separate sample groups, eliminating the need to choose between reliability and validation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system design allows the same processing apparatus to perform multiple functions: routine sample processing with established reagents and validation processing with new reagents. The controller is configured to manage both validation protocols and routine protocols, making the system multi-functional and increasing productivity without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the system implements separate validation protocols for each reagent container, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereagent validation thoroughnessVSAvoidprocessing protocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is designed with multi-functionality to manage both validation protocols and routine processing protocols using the same hardware resources. This universal design allows the system to implement thorough validation for each reagent container while avoiding the complexity of separate dedicated validation systems, as the same processor handles both functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the system uses control samples to validate reagents, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to additional validation steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereagent performance verificationVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs validation using control samples as a preliminary action before routine processing begins. By validating reagents in advance on dedicated control samples, the system ensures reliability is established beforehand, and subsequent routine processing can proceed without time-consuming validation interruptions, thus minimizing overall time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2920571B1Method and apparatus for reagent validation in automated sample processing
Publication Date: 2020.01.08 AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • EP2920571B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP2920571B1 patent drawingFigure 1b~1c
  • EP2920571B1 patent drawingFigure 2a

AI summary

Method and apparatus for automatic sample processing including reagent validation are disclosed. The apparatus may include a reagent section, a slide section, a robotic element configured to perform sample processing operations, and a sample processing controller configured to control the robotic element according to a processing protocol. The method of performing automatic sample processing using an automatic sample processing apparatus that includes a plurality of sample carriers, a plurality of reagent containers, and a robotic processing element, may include designating at least one group from among the plurality of sample carriers as corresponding to at least one group from among the plurality of reagent containers according to a grouping plan and controlling the robotic processing element to perform processing steps according to a processing protocol on the at least one group of the plurality of sample carriers using reagents obtained from the corresponding at least one group of the plurality of reagent containers and not from a non-corresponding group of reagent containers.