SAN Configuration Validation with Ambiguous Resource Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional storage area network management systems face challenges in efficiently validating configurations due to complexity and the need for precise mapping of resources to specific vendor products, leading to time-consuming manual verification and potential incompatibility issues.

Innovation Solution

A storage area network advisory system that applies validation rules to proposed configurations against compatibility data, even when resources are ambiguously mapped, providing notifications on acceptable permutations and resource type requirements for compatibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional validation techniques map all SAN resources to specific vendor product identities, then validation accuracy is improved, but system complexity and manual verification time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system segments resources into two categories: those with unambiguous vendor product mappings and those with ambiguous mappings. This segmentation allows the system to apply different validation strategies to each category, reducing overall complexity while maintaining validation accuracy for resources that can be precisely identified.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial validation by validating configurations against ambiguous mappings without requiring complete resolution of all ambiguities. This approach validates what can be validated while tolerating uncertainty in other areas, reducing manual intervention requirements while maintaining sufficient validation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If manual verification of SAN configuration is performed, then configuration compatibility is ensured, but time consumption and administrative burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration compatibilityVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system performs self-service by automatically validating SAN configurations against ambiguous mappings without requiring manual administrator intervention. The system independently identifies compatibility issues and provides validation results, ensuring configuration compatibility while eliminating time-consuming manual verification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If resources are ambiguously mapped to multiple possible types, then system adaptability is improved, but validation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource mapping flexibilityVSAvoidvalidation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system handles multiple resource types universally by validating configurations against ambiguous mappings that can represent multiple possible resource types. This universal approach maintains adaptability to different resource configurations while managing validation complexity through standardized validation processes that work across multiple types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8046477B1Configuration validation and ambiguous mapping
Publication Date: 2011.10.25 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US8046477B1 patent drawing
  • US8046477B1 patent drawing
  • US8046477B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A rule engine applies storage area network configuration validation rules to verify whether a proposed storage area network configuration includes compatible resources for use in a storage area network environment. The storage area network configuration validation rules enable a proposed combination of storage area network resources to be validated against compatibility data in a repository even when one or more of the resources in the proposed combination ambiguously maps to multiple possible resources and each of other resources in the proposed combination specifically maps to a single respective known component type. Accordingly, an advisory system herein can provide notification whether a proposed or existing storage area network configuration is qualified for use even though one or more of the resources in the combination is ambiguously mapped to multiple possible storage area network resource types.