Sand-Printed Prototype Models Strengthened by Resin Impregnation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing prototype models, such as manual prototyping, milling, and 3D printing, face challenges including high time consumption, suboptimal precision, and high costs, particularly in the automotive and aerospace sectors.

Innovation Solution

A method involving sand 3D printing followed by resin impregnation with specific viscosity, density, and pot life characteristics is employed to create prototype models, enhancing strength and detail while reducing production time and cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual prototyping (clay modeling) is used, then the model can be created with custom design flexibility, but the production time is excessively long and precision is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical modeling with automated 3D printing technology. The sand 3D printing system uses computer-controlled layer-by-layer deposition to create prototypes, eliminating the need for manual clay modeling while maintaining design flexibility through digital model input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of material state from soft clay requiring manual manipulation to sand particles that are selectively bound by a binder jet. This parameter change enables automated fabrication while preserving design freedom, as the sand can be precisely deposited in any configuration defined by digital models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If prototyping by milling is used, then the model can be produced with good surface finish, but the production time is excessively long (2-3 days for a 1-meter automotive model)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish qualityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of removing material from a solid block as in milling, the patent uses additive manufacturing where material (sand with binder) is deposited only where needed layer by layer. This inversion of the manufacturing approach dramatically reduces production time while achieving the required surface finish through controlled layer deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary digital preparation of the 3D model, slicing it into layers and generating toolpaths before fabrication begins. This preliminary computational action enables the physical printing process to proceed efficiently without real-time decision-making delays, reducing overall production time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If conventional 3D printing methods (SLS, ALS, FDM) are used, then the production time is reduced and precision is improved, but the cost becomes very high due to expensive print materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidmaterial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses sand as the primary material, which is extremely inexpensive compared to the specialized materials required by conventional 3D printing methods. The sand serves as a disposable support structure and final material that can be easily handled and disposed of, dramatically reducing material costs while maintaining production speed and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameter from expensive specialized polymers or metals to common sand particles. This parameter change is enabled by using a binder jetting approach where a binding agent selectively cements sand particles together, allowing the use of low-cost materials while achieving the structural integrity and precision required for high-quality prototypes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If sand 3D printing is used, then the production time is reduced and cost is lowered, but the structural strength of the model is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidmodel structural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite material structure by combining sand particles with a binding agent. The sand provides the structural framework and shape, while the binder cements the particles together to provide structural strength. This composite approach enables the use of weak individual materials (sand) to create a strong final prototype structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and bonding parameters of the sand material. By controlling the binder jet deposition parameters, particle size distribution, and curing conditions, the patent transforms loose sand particles into a structurally sound solid form that can support detailed features and withstand handling, thereby improving strength while maintaining the advantages of sand printing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves faster production times, higher detail precision, and lower costs compared to existing methods, making it suitable for automotive, aerospace, architectural, and artistic applications.

Implementation Method 1

impregnating said sand-printed prototype model with resin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentEP3831578B1Method for the production of prototype models
Publication Date: 2025.12.31 SLAYER BLADES
  • EP3831578B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3831578B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A method (1) for the production of prototype models, in particular prototypes for the automotive sector, which comprises the steps of: a. creating a prototype model using sand 3D printing; b. impregnating the sand-printed model with resin.