Sandbox-Derived Environmental Indicators for Malware Deterrence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current malware detection systems in enterprise organizations lack proactive measures to prevent malware execution, especially when anti-analysis and target filtering mechanisms are employed by malware programs, leading to delayed detection and potential network compromise.

Innovation Solution

A malware security platform that uses environmental indicators to generate inoculation messages, integrating these indicators into computing devices to prevent malware execution by spoofing anti-analysis and target filtering mechanisms, thereby enhancing proactive protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current malware detection systems use manual human intervention and perimeter layer controls, then detection capability is maintained, but proactive prevention capability is lost and response time is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalware detection reliabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of malware samples in sandbox environments before they can execute on target systems. By extracting environmental indicators during this preliminary sandboxing phase, the system proactively identifies anti-analysis and target filtering mechanisms before malware deployment, enabling preemptive countermeasures rather than reactive response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer between malware detection and response operations. This intermediary component automatically extracts environmental indicators from sandboxed malware analysis and generates inoculation messages that are distributed to computing devices, bridging the gap between detection and proactive prevention without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If malware programs use anti_analysis and target filtering mechanisms, then execution control is maintained, but detection difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalware execution controlVSAvoiddetection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the harmful anti-analysis and target filtering mechanisms into beneficial detection signals. By extracting environmental indicators that reveal these mechanisms during sandbox analysis, the system transforms what were previously hidden protective measures into visible markers that enable automated detection and generate inoculation messages to prevent malware execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection parameter from traditional malware signature matching to environmental indicator analysis. By monitoring changes in system environment parameters (registry entries, file system structures, hardware information) that occur when malware attempts to execute, the system can detect and identify anti-analysis mechanisms without relying on direct malware code analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If proactive inoculation measures are implemented, then malware prevention capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalware prevention capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the malware prevention function into distinct modular components: sandbox environment for malware analysis, environmental indicator extraction module, inoculation message generation module, and device integration module. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining proactive prevention capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal inoculation message format that can be applied across multiple computing devices and malware types. By extracting environmental indicators that are common to various malware families and using them to generate standardized inoculation messages, the system achieves broad preventive coverage without requiring device-specific or malware-specific complex configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12450334B2Malware deterrence using computer environment indicators
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US12450334B2 patent drawing
  • US12450334B2 patent drawing
  • US12450334B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for inoculating a computer network against malware is described. Specifically, environmental indicators used by anti-analysis and target filtering mechanisms of a malware program may be determined based on analysis within a virtual or physical sandbox environment. The environmental indicators may be sent to computing devices associated with the computing network. The malware program, based on the environmental indicators, may be spoofed to assume that a computing device is associated with an anti-malware system, and/or is a device that is not to be infected. Based on this assumption, the malware program may not execute within the computing device.