Sanding Pad Abrasiveness Tracking With Wear-Model Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated finishing systems face challenges in efficiently tracking and managing the wear of sanding pads during the sanding process, leading to inconsistent material removal and surface finish quality due to the inability to accurately predict and respond to abrasive degradation in real-time.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes a wear model and force sensors to monitor and estimate abrasive degradation of sanding pads, adjusting processing parameters in real-time and triggering pad replacement when degradation exceeds a threshold, ensuring consistent material removal and surface finish by autonomously navigating the sanding head and modifying toolpaths based on contact characteristics and abrasive effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If automated finishing systems use traditional sanding pad wear tracking methods, then the system structure remains simple, but material removal consistency and surface finish quality deteriorate due to inability to accurately predict and respond to abrasive degradation in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing wear models before actual sanding operations begin. These models predict abrasive degradation based on expected usage conditions, allowing the system to proactively adjust parameters or schedule pad replacements before actual wear affects surface finish quality. This preventive approach maintains manufacturing precision without requiring complex real-time monitoring infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where force sensor data from actual sanding operations is continuously fed back to update and refine wear models. This closed-loop feedback allows the system to learn from actual wear patterns and improve prediction accuracy over time, maintaining consistent surface finish while adapting to specific workpiece materials and sanding conditions without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If the system implements real-time wear monitoring and adjustment, then material removal consistency improves, but processing time increases due to continuous monitoring and parameter adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal consistencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial monitoring action by focusing wear monitoring and parameter adjustments only on critical sanding parameters and key performance indicators. Rather than continuously analyzing all possible variables, the system monitors selected force metrics and wear indicators that have the greatest impact on material removal consistency. This selective approach maintains precision while minimizing the time overhead associated with comprehensive monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary parameter adjustments based on predicted wear trends before actual wear degrades performance. By proactively modifying sanding parameters according to wear model predictions, the system maintains consistent material removal without needing to react to actual wear conditions, thereby avoiding time losses from continuous real-time adjustments and reactive corrections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the system proactively replaces sanding pads based on wear prediction, then abrasive effectiveness is maintained, but productivity decreases due to frequent pad replacements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabrasive effectivenessVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary pad replacement actions based on predictive wear analysis rather than reactive replacement. By monitoring wear models and predicting when pads will reach their effective life limit, the system schedules replacements at optimal moments during non-productive periods or between workpieces. This allows the system to maintain abrasive effectiveness while minimizing interruptions to overall productivity, replacing pads before wear degrades performance but not so early as to waste functional pad life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts pad replacement timing based on actual wear rates observed during operation. Rather than using fixed replacement schedules, the system adapts replacement decisions to actual sanding conditions, workpiece materials, and observed wear patterns. This dynamic approach ensures pads are replaced based on actual effectiveness degradation rather than arbitrary time or usage thresholds, maintaining reliability while optimizing productivity by extending pad life whenever conditions allow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12257712B2Methods for tracking abrasiveness of a sanding pad
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 GRAYMATTER ROBOTICS INC
  • US12257712B2 patent drawing
  • US12257712B2 patent drawing
  • US12257712B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes: accessing a toolpath and processing parameters—including a target force and feed rate—assigned to a region of a workpiece; and accessing a wear model representing abrasive degradation of a sanding pad arranged on a sanding head. The method also includes, during a processing cycle: accessing force values output by a force sensor coupled to the sanding head; navigating the sanding head across the workpiece region according to the toolpath and, based on the force values deviating the sanding head from the toolpath to maintain forces of the sanding head on the workpiece region proximal the target force; accessing contact characteristics representing contact between the sanding pad and the workpiece; estimating abrasive degradation of the sanding pad based on the wear model and the sequence of contact characteristics; and modifying the set of processing parameters based on the abrasive degradation.